Posts from Post-tournament analysis and discussion of the CIS Tournament Regulations.

CIS-2016
Post-mortem analysis.

I'll start with the main point. My colleagues asked me to share my opinion about the incident that occurred during the tournament. Of course, I won't name the participants of the incident; I will only describe the situation itself, which, in my opinion, requires a detailed analysis. A match is in progress. One of the opponents demonstrates a clear advantage, and during the final battle, their victory becomes obvious. The opponents take a break. They call the judge and register the defeat of the one who has practically already won. At the same time, the amount and details of the deal become known to the public. However, unfortunately, the Head Judge of the competition only learns about this situation after the fact – already after the start of the next round, or even after its end. As a result, no disciplinary decisions were made, and the incident was not investigated.

In which city did this epic event take place? Or are you talking about online battles...? Are you ready to take on organizing the CIS-2017 tournament? Or CIS-2018? And at a high level. At the same time, a clear distinction must be made between an online computer game championship and an offline championship. Because offline, you will have to deal with many more headaches than in a standard online tournament.
I'm asking again - Are you ready to take on organizing and running a worthy offline CIS tournament for Heroes? Because otherwise, it's just ordinary demagoguery that has nothing to do with reality.

Since you're so smart and understand everything better than others,
even if you were paid, you wouldn't do any better.

By the way, I don't understand why nicknames aren't used.

Kirill loves writing posts where he is the only holy d'Artagnan, so it's no surprise that citizens can't restrain themselves and occasionally throw manure at him.

2Dust: The cultural program in St. Petersburg didn't interest me personally not because I'm from Moscow and have already seen everything I wanted to see in St. Petersburg.

The idea is that once a year, the strongest players gather together and, through live gameplay, are ready to prove that Heroes 3 is not dead yet.

to compare who has the bigger... well, you know.

Anyone who doesn't show up is a loser xD

It's just funny, almost everything that was written.
All the players played sober and tried to win, even after losing their chance of victory (well, almost all of them ;), and on the last day, some were playing for fun and suggested extending it for one more round.
The alcohol-fueled chaos was only in the evening. When the games were going on, they would shut up those who were shouting.
I understand that it's difficult to determine the strongest player in just 5 matches, but playing without a break for 2 months is stupid. And the championship is called CIS, not BO77.

Honestly, I'm so annoyed by this paternalistic analysis, that they all came to drink, and no one even plays Heroes, and doesn't even know how to play. Those who came to drink, drank, and those who came to play, played. And those who didn't come are losers xD

A very pompous name. "CIS" boosts self-esteem, but does it match its level? purely based on sporting principles?
...further in the text...

blah-blah-blah
Although, what nonsense am I writing? blah-blah-blah