Skip to content

Posts from Where are you, fellow enthusiasts? Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
Why haven't aliens visited us yet?
11 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#77
Auto-translated
if you enter one Black Hole, you will exit from another.
I don't like this method for several reasons. Firstly, we still don't know much about these wormholes; it might work one way, or it might work differently. I personally don't want to test it by sacrificing myself. Secondly, you still have to fly to the Black Hole. And not just any random Black Hole, but the right Black Hole. So, in reality, the task is only slightly simplified, if it's simplified at all.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
In reply to Ment
User Avatar
#78
Auto-translated
Ment
I understand...
It just reminds me of this. Back in the day, a lot of epicycles were used to "explain" the apparent movement of planets across the "celestial sphere." And in the end, it all turned out to be... well, you get the idea.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#79
Auto-translated
?
С уважением, Дубинкин.
User Avatar
#80
Auto-translated
It just reminds me of that. Back then, a lot of epicycles also "explained" the apparent movement of planets across the "celestial sphere." And in the end, it all turned out to be... well, you know.
Yeah... But in that theory, there wasn't anything particularly bad, except for the terrible inconvenience and the lack of a clear explanation for such orbits. But it worked.
To build a new theory, you first need to make sure it explains the facts known at the moment (described by the old theory), plus explains the facts that are known but go beyond the scope of the existing theory.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#81
Auto-translated
Mr. Dubinkin, did you want to ask something?

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#82
Auto-translated
Just theories, but no practice. I don't believe in the value of theories without practice. :D By the way, judging by this topic, some people have already flown in "alien spaceships." :D
Вдруг, откуда ни возьмись, ниоткуда не взялось.

Музыкальное оформление.
In reply to Ment
User Avatar
#83
Auto-translated
Ment
To build a new theory, one must first ensure that it explains the facts known at the present time (as described by the old theory), and also explains the facts that are known but lie beyond the scope of the existing theory.
The problem is that the root cause of observed facts may turn out to be something completely different than we think. History proves this.:smile26:
Special and General Relativity may explain many things, but they also prohibit traveling faster than light. What if they are not correct, but simply mathematically explain "observed phenomena"?

Added 2 minutes later
Ethereal
Just theories, but no practice.
The practical application would be to accelerate to the speed of light, fly to the Andromeda Galaxy, and upon returning, see what century it is on Earth.:D
But this is advice of the same level as 2500 years ago, suggesting flying a quarter of the Earth's meridian to verify, for example, the theory of the "Central Fire."...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#84
Auto-translated
Yeah. I can imagine how Yashur took/is taking exams.

Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
In reply to Небо
User Avatar
#85
Auto-translated
Sky
Yeah. I can imagine how Yaschur took/is taking exams.
Following the principle of "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's." :p

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#86
Auto-translated
Yashur, I'm a little afraid to ask, but why would a Caesar need a Cesarean section? Is he giving birth? XD
С уважением, Дубинкин.
#87
Auto-translated
Wow, what's the speed of light? Getting to the first cosmic velocity is a problem here...
User Avatar
#88
Auto-translated
The image is probably from some anti-Russian website.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#89
Auto-translated
Anti-Arandor.
The first image in Google search for "everything is according to God's will".
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
In reply to Dybinkin
User Avatar
#90
Auto-translated
Dybinkin
Why would Caesar need a Cesarean section? Is he giving birth? XD
Ask Google. It will definitely give you an answer.

Added after 33 seconds
Dagr
Yashchur, what is the speed of light? Getting to the first cosmic velocity is a problem here...
Well, that's what I was talking about...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).