Skip to content

Posts from Forum Auto-translated

1.0 (1 rating)
In reply to Wicc
#6788
Auto-translated
Wicc
Well, by the way, the idea about returning to previous generations is not bad.

But it would be better to implement it in a more aesthetically pleasing way - we play 111 five times, saving at the end of blue's turn. Then we start eliminating generations, starting with red, each eliminating 2 generations, and we play on the remaining one.
True, some people might not have any restarts at all, or only have one on turn 113. Taking this into account, we need to save at the end of red's turn as well. By the way, this will eliminate empty turns and losses in generations where a restart is expected.
Summer 2013


In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#6789
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
The idea is interesting. Although it might take a lot of time. We just need to consider what will happen in case of a restart due to a match or a technical restart?
You can play 6 generations and mark blue-red-blue-red-blue. If there is an objective restart on the remaining one, then return to the last marked one. At the same time, we give a small advantage to blue, as it loses more from being marked out of 5 than red.

In terms of time, it will correspond to 12 in-game half-days. The usual restart scheme (3 days each) with a complete selection of them takes 1+2+1+2+1+2+2 = 11 in-game half-days.
User Avatar
#6790
Auto-translated
Why doesn't anyone ban the clowns for spamming/flooding, or at least delete their blatantly stupid posts? I remember getting a 3-day ban just for testing whether it's possible to delete a comment on a deleted post. Hello? :smile12:
Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.

484800548

In reply to Сатир
User Avatar
#6791
Auto-translated
Satyr
Why doesn't anyone ban clowns for spamming/flooding, or at least delete obviously stupid posts? I remember getting a 3-day ban just for testing whether it's possible to delete a comment on a deleted post. Hello? :smile12:
Everything is correct! Enough of this nonsense, we had some fun, and that's it.
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#6793
Auto-translated
Closed it, so I’ll create it later, since it bothered the administration, even though those couple of topics didn’t really disrupt the forum. Why close it? And did those couple of topics really bother anyone? You’re ruining all the fun… Maybe someone wants to create a topic about the administration abusing its power; I would vote in favor of it. Can someone post a link to the forum rules? I’ll read them, because those topics weren’t spam.
672466033
Миха#7845
Ландау лев https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNj_9EQxDoI&t=1174s

Тут делимся книгами /topic/at/1139927/
In reply to ДаУ
User Avatar
#6794
Auto-translated
DaU
They closed it, so I'll create it later, since it bothered the administration, even though those few topics didn't really bother the forum. Why close it? And did those few topics really bother anyone? You're ruining all the fun... Maybe someone wants to create a topic about the administration exceeding its authority; I would vote for it. Can someone post a link to the forum rules so I can read them, because those topics weren't spam.

http://heroes3.tv/aiwe
In reply to ДаУ
User Avatar
#6795
Auto-translated
Yur, I have nothing against a normal discussion, but when it turns into nonsense and troll-like behavior in the thread about experience, okay, we can tolerate it. But when it starts with nonsense about "making the" Inferno portal cheaper and diplomacy for creatures of level 1-2, that's already too much.
DaU
They closed it, but I'll create it later if it bothered the administration, because those few threads didn't really harm the forum. Why close it? And did those few threads really bother anyone? You're ruining all the fun... Maybe someone wants to create a thread about the abuse of power by the administration; I would vote for it. Can someone post a link to the forum rules so I can read them, because those threads weren't spam.
Let's refer to the FORUM RULES, which you obviously haven't read. There are also rules for moderators/coordinators.
Let's pay attention to the following point:

If a user's message contains spam, flame, or trolling, it should be removed by a moderator with the label 'Spam', 'Flame', 'Trolling' accordingly.
DaU
because those threads weren't spam.
Spam (from English flood) is idle chatter, messages in internet forums and chats that take up (in many cases) large amounts of space and do not contain any information or contain very little useful information. Spam is spread either out of boredom or with the aim of trolling, for example, out of a desire to annoy someone.
I think the thread about creature experience and "making the" Inferno portal cheaper perfectly fits into this category.

P.S. If at least 2-3 people write to me here or on ICQ that one of these threads is useful and needed, I will immediately restore it.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#6796
Auto-translated
Nothing changes on HeroesWorld, neither the people nor the tournaments; everyone is dissatisfied with something, yet nothing changes. Are there really not those two who would want to influence the game to improve it? Well, where are you, let’s come up with something together, or do you have absolutely nothing in mind and everyone is satisfied with everything?
672466033
Миха#7845
Ландау лев https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNj_9EQxDoI&t=1174s

Тут делимся книгами /topic/at/1139927/
User Avatar
#6797
Auto-translated
I don't object to the aforementioned topic, but I'm not a hardcore player of the third game, so I'll remain silent. My opinion on this matter is not particularly relevant.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#6798
Auto-translated
No matter how much you try to cheapen the portal, it won't get any better; only a complete overhaul will help, for example, so that you can fly to any city. And diplomacy on creatures of level 1 and 2 is complete nonsense – everyone will play with diplomacy and gather a bunch of units to destroy everything.

And the problem isn't a lack of desire to improve the game. The problem is that the method you suggested is useless and even seems like trolling.

Added 1 minute ago
I'm so bored in the evenings in the village that I'm writing such things.
http://heroes3.tv/aiwe
In reply to Aiwe
User Avatar
#6799
Auto-translated
Aiwe
Play with diplomacy and recruit a bunch of units to destroy everything.
Test it first, then talk... And the dungeon portal is somehow not bad, but there are аж 2 buildings (for mana + portal) and nothing, it's not bad.
I tested 84 skeletons for 5000 gold, 52 greymalkin kentaurs for 4600 on expert difficulty; why did Bishop and Hellknight vote for diplomacy? Or are they also noobs?/topic/11126/
38 gremlins for 1500, 71 fey for 1500, but Necropolis has a lower chance of light heroes appearing (from Castle, Rampart, Tower - with diplomacy), and the probability of getting diplomacy is relatively low. Also, very few come for free, test it.

By the way, have you noticed if the special abilities of heroes work correctly on monsters (does Shakti really add attack and defense to troglodytes every level?)
672466033
Миха#7845
Ландау лев https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNj_9EQxDoI&t=1174s

Тут делимся книгами /topic/at/1139927/
#6800
Auto-translated
Dude, you’re really clueless. Before writing your “brilliant” ideas, at least research the topic. The chance of diplomacy appearing for Necropolis is only 4% higher for Priests. Also, regarding joining for gold, a lot depends on the power you have, and as I understand it, not only the quantity but also the type matters, i.e., creatures are much more likely to join if they are of the same faction. And even if it’s for gold, it’s still a huge bonus, in skilled hands, in the first 1-2 weeks (and if you have a Necromancer or especially an Inferno secondary hero, even in the late game), completely changing the entire gameplay and the balance of castles/heroes. I don’t know why Bishop and Hellight voted for it; maybe they were just bored, or maybe they were trolling, knowing that this idea is doomed to fail anyway.
In reply to LuckyF
User Avatar
#6801
Auto-translated
LuckyF
The chance of Necromancers getting diplomacy is 4% higher, but only for Priests.
4% is a low probability, even though it's almost the same for everyone.
LuckyF
Also, regarding joining for gold, a lot depends on the power you have, and as I understand it, not only the quantity but also the type.
This exists in the physical game; you're not saying anything new. I tested it, and very few join for free. Test how well diplomacy works for Necromancers, test it.
672466033
Миха#7845
Ландау лев https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNj_9EQxDoI&t=1174s

Тут делимся книгами /topic/at/1139927/
In reply to ДаУ
User Avatar
#6802
Auto-translated
Alright, let me answer you in detail, since you still don't seem to understand. Regarding the idea of diplomacy for levels 1-2, it's a decent idea overall, but the community didn't embrace it, as evidenced by the previous vote. There's no need to create the same poll every month, hoping that, like in a fairy tale, the situation will magically change. As for "making the Inferno portal cheaper" (I don't know how your brain even came up with that word :D), there are many issues. 1. You didn't even provide your suggestions: how much "cheaper"? Why? etc. 2. I also want to "make Cyclops and Titans cheaper." If we can "make the portal cheaper," then can we make all buildings cheaper? If everyone starts suggesting what to "make cheaper" and what not, it will turn into a huge mess. Today, we'll "make the portal cheaper," and tomorrow, we won't like the Mystic Fountain. 3. Who will "make it cheaper"? Will Baratorch just "make it cheaper" based on your poll? If, after all this, you still don't understand the absurdity of your topics, then I'm very sorry.