Posts from Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

I'm not sure I fully understood the meaning of "about this and that, very very." But if you're talking about the fact that the AC would have made a decision about the validity of the result and submitted a proposal to ban the Admiral's Hat in the future, then in my opinion, that would have been the most correct thing to do. As they say, everyone gets what they want. (even if there was a vote, the majority would have supported this idea, although this is, of course, an absolutely unimportant point).

I understand that if you write something like that, your opinion is that using SHA is fair...logical? (since you're doubting and want to hold a vote:smile20:). After that, no further comments...

To start, yes, I'm not 80% of the community, but I'm one of those people on this forum who had no idea about this bug, and I'm definitely not the only one, believe me. Your sarcasm is good, and I can also come up with grand phrases.

Yeah, the absurdity is growing.

Tell me, oh Tim and Dim, did Reddit kill the meaning and essence of the Game with his mysterious move?

For example, Berserk used to be countered by the epic "anti-magic on ducks"))) AoTD+KS is countered by archers, mosh, parameters.
Infinite ballista ammo in PvP is just ridiculous!

So there's no comparison.
Reddit's performance is not only disrespect to the opponent, it's DISRESPECT TO THE GAME ITSELF.
Those who think otherwise also disrespect the game(((
And there's really nothing to argue about.
Personal quirks in the head, even if supported by powerful demagogic skills, are a personal matter for everyone.

+1
In my opinion, after such arguments, you start to understand more and more who is who in life, even if you don't know people in person:cool:

That's why I said that almost everyone knew, in my opinion, and I don't think either of us has exact data. With your phrase, "I didn't know about this bug, but almost everyone did?!" you're provoking sarcasm for perfectly understandable reasons.
I don't know how else to explain it more clearly. I don't know what would have happened with a different decision from the Arbitration Committee, but in my opinion, it would have been more logical and well-considered. I've already given three facts that are persistently being ignored. It's no longer relevant to copy and paste them, and it's actually funny.
Answering your question with an analogy: cigarettes used to be sold everywhere, even in ice cream kiosks. Now, cigarettes are sold either in supermarkets or in specialized stores. However, no one is suing those ice cream kiosks or imposing sanctions on them.
I hope I've answered your question clearly.

The most annoying thing is the far-fetched comparisons.
Even after Maradona's handball goal, the English could have still equalized, although it wouldn't have been easy, but they still could have.
But what if someone had shot the English team from the stands – and not just some random guy, but the Argentinian coach himself – would they have awarded Argentina the victory? Because you won't find the word "machine gun" in the RULES OF FOOTBALL... although, of course, the coach would have been put in jail for 15 days for disturbing the peace, but what wouldn't you do for a semi-final spot?)))
That's a more or less adequate analogy to this "well-known feature."

Timur, I think you don't understand the difference between a bug and an abuse/exploit.

a) Nitro and Redwhite knew about the Admiral's Hat. They were on equal footing! I'm most interested in whether the AK took this into account? And why are those who support the AK's decision to replay the game or even award Red a loss ignoring it?
b) There have already been precedents for this abuse, and they have been discussed on the forum. The AK doesn't live in the wilderness, and I think they saw the topic, if not all members of the AK, then at least most of them.
c) I don't know about you, but I personally haven't noticed any masochistic tendencies or a tendency to self-flagellation in Nitro.
He himself, weighing all the pros and cons, wrote that he recognizes the defeat. And I suspect it wasn't easy for him to do, after all, it wasn't a fun game, but a game for a place in a serious tournament group, and the AK kindly brought the replay on a silver platter. It is up to the participant of this game to judge the fairness/unfairness of the AK's decision, and he has made his choice.

...I don't understand the AK's decision...

Kostya, I don't understand a lot of things, and this might be one of them, but in this situation, I don't understand the decision of the Arbitration Committee, considering...

a) Nitro and Redwhite knew about the admiral's hat. They were on equal footing! What I'm most curious about is whether the AC took this into account? And why does everyone who supports the AC's decision for a rematch or even awarding Red a defeat overlook this?
b) Precedents for this exploit have already occurred and been discussed on the forum, the AC doesn't live in the middle of nowhere, and I think if not all AC members saw that thread, then a large part certainly did.
c) I don't know about you, but I personally haven't noticed any sadomasochistic tendencies in Nitro, or an acceptance of life through self-flagellation and the like.
He himself, after weighing all the pros and cons, wrote that he accepts the defeat. And I suspect it was oh so hard to do, it was after all not a fun game, but a match for advancing from the group stage of a serious tournament, and on top of that the AC kindly offered a rematch on a silver platter. Who if not a participant in that game should judge the fairness/unfairness of the AC's decision, and he made his choice.