Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

I'm not sure I fully understood the meaning of "about this and that, very very." But if you're talking about the fact that the AC would have made a decision about the validity of the result and submitted a proposal to ban the Admiral's Hat in the future, then in my opinion, that would have been the most correct thing to do. As they say, everyone gets what they want. (even if there was a vote, the majority would have supported this idea, although this is, of course, an absolutely unimportant point).

For starters, yes, I'm not 80% of the community, but I am one of those people on this forum who had no idea about this bug and definitely not the only one, believe me. Your sarcasm is good, and I can also come up with elaborate phrases. For example, people who express sarcastic remarks towards other people (a person) who are quite serious and raise a question about an urgent problem are at least inappropriate. And in the end, once again, I heard an incomplete answer, but never mind, I repeat, "the AC WOULD NOT HAVE LAUGHED" (I want to hear your opinion) in the event that a person who used a BUG was awarded the victory, and immediately a clause was added to the rules prohibiting the BUG and technical defeat or even more severe penalties in case of using the same BUG. In other words, today I can use it, and tomorrow you will be disqualified from tournaments for a year for the same thing, what do you think about that?!

P.S.
To Lizard
By the way, Kostya, I remembered about Maradona, yes, he scored with his hand, and everyone has known about it for a long time, but by the way, nothing has changed so far, Messi, if I'm not mistaken, also showed our generation the same goal with his hand:cool: