Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

You are arguing about different concepts. Some are concerned with preserving the "spirit of the game," while others are concerned with the "formal rules" at the time. According to the rules, there was no violation because there was no prohibition against this. Since there was no violation, the victory is formally valid. However, if you look at the situation from the player's perspective and simply from a human point of view, such a victory is complete idiocy and absurdity. I am genuinely surprised that this was not explicitly prohibited earlier. But since no one raised the issue of this bug before, the opportunity has passed. Dirty played a significant role in this (surprisingly, which is even more surprising). He talked about some kind of abuse and exploit, and then allowed others to use it: D:D. He misled the respected audience, the solid heroes. With his authoritative and somewhat official opinion. But in the end, the entire AK was blamed: D. (I suggest whipping them, then feeling sorry and forgiving them: D) In my understanding, abuse is when you attack with a hit-and-run tactic, cast a spell, and retreat, then attack again. That's a real abuse. Or even farming neutral creatures with single units is also a kind of "abuse" because they are foolish and chase after them instead of approaching the main stacks and attacking them. But this is on a much smaller scale in terms of significance. But increasing the number of moves to the point that it gives a cheat (or even more) is not abuse; it's a bug.