Auto-translated
What about the Emperor?
А, вот почему.
??+⛓️♿=?
??+⛓️♿=?
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
It seems that neither of our "security councils" is thinking about peace.
What about the Emperor?
What if we want to play a cold war game? Let's create analogs of NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
Maybe we can create/remake the Security Council so that it includes everyone by default?
If the UN1 prohibits something, then all its members cannot have it. But the irony is that in our case, the UN1 prohibits its members from having chemical weapons, and suddenly all sorts of Steelmans start acquiring them and don't care about the UN1; it didn't prohibit them. As a result, the UN1 simply...
Drug distribution is tightly controlled by the government.
Third party candidates are now gaining some representation in Parliament.
Heavy industry must go to expensive lengths to dispose of waste.
Revan: when he starts the main part of the game.
"Evil capitalists."
Perhaps Revan fell in love, became depressed due to a negative outlook on life, and will no longer host anything.
As a result, the UN simply weakened its members and exposed them to the threat from the Steelmen, who possess chemical weapons.

I don't understand, Ment, why your current government is hindering the country's economic and military development, despite having an economy rated at ninety-seven points. I can't grasp it. You have a socialist opposition, but it's suppressed and can't do anything. The stupid and corrupt members of parliament are controlled by corporations, and there's no evil dictator. So, what's the problem? Are there also idiots in the corporations, making deals with who knows who and for what reason? What's stopping them?
Maybe Revan has fallen in love, become depressed due to a negative outlook on life, and won't organize anything anymore. Then the Mushroom People will stagnate in the development of their state apparatus.
That's precisely the wrong conclusion. If someone uses a despicable, prohibited tactic, there's no need to want to use that tactic yourself and emulate them.
But if there's a conflict between two countries, and one Security Council supports the first, and the other supports the second, then that's bad.
The problem isn't with the Security Councils; the problem is that they are not pacifists in practice.
So, who's in power then? Are the barbarians with sticks still in charge?