Posts from Mafia 90. The Tale of Oldforest.

Yashchur and Sesam, what are you trying to say? That a failed block equals a successful block? What is an unsuccessful block? Is it when the blocker dies on the way? Probably from laughing! Read carefully!!!
We know that the Bard successfully performed his action – he prevented the witch's apprentice, who was given a speed boost with tea, from conducting two investigations... We know that the Fire Elemental successfully performed his action against Kosha – he lured her to the swamp and kept her there. We know that the Werewolf performed his action, and only the Knight's defense stopped him, not a block. All three mafia members made their moves, and no one stopped them, and you continue to insist that Kosha was blocked by the Fire Elemental? Read the newspaper again. The Bard performed his action, the Werewolf performed his action, the Fire Elemental performed his action, and the Fire Elemental's action is only reflected in the newspaper if it was successful!!! If he successfully blocked Kosha, and the Bard blocked Alex, how can the Bard be Kosha? Explain? If you believe that the entries in the newspaper should be interpreted contrary to logic, like this: "If a blocker comes to block a blocker who has already performed his block earlier that night, the second blocker's block should be considered successful (despite its meaninglessness)," then we can develop this thought: if a killer comes to kill a person who was killed earlier that night by another killer, then this killing (of a corpse) should also be considered successful (and leave clues!) :smile09: In short, if I used to think that the Heroist (based on the first investigation, 1/3) and the Snowman (based on behavior) were mafia, now I am increasingly convinced of the Heroist's innocence and the guilt of the Mentalist (who some are so actively defending) and one of you:smile48: I just don't understand yet who of you is mafia and who is just a little bit clueless.

Added 1 minute ago

Plus, regarding the question.

Shaman, maybe this question has already been asked, but what is the principle behind awarding clues in the Schism map? Is it 1 clue for each enemy killed, or 1 clue for each mass killing?

If he were a Mafia member, he would have been attacking everyone here about playing psychological games and so on.

But why wouldn't a peaceful Ment-Priest (Warlord) answer yes-yes-no? With such answers, he wouldn't have any mafia roles as potential candidates. It's all very strange...

1. Are you mafia? No
2. Are you a peaceful role? Yes
3. Is there a killing Night Action? No

The Knight helped the Shaman control the rampant evil forces and completely forgot that he was going to protect someone.

The Ment acted somewhat unusually. He walked around the town, singing ditties, and also gave expensive gifts to everyone. Many thought he was a little out of his mind, but no one dared to tell him.

You can execute me if you want, I don't mind.

So, the guard turns out to be either a priest or a werewolf?

But didn't we agree that on the second night, he was confused by the witch?

regardless of whether the block was successful or not, it is considered successful if it was applied to a player who used their Night Action that night.

Or a warlord.