Posts from Scripts Auto-translated

1) What does Nimus have to do with it? I know perfectly well myself. 2) I tried that, but it didn't help.

A semicolon is also missing in the line
eh1p = 1

Added 3 minutes later
and the same issue occurs in subsequent functions.

A semicolon is missing in the line
eh1p = 1

Added 3 minutes later
and the same issue occurs in subsequent functions.

lua doesn't care whether there is a ";" or not.
Remove "end" before "else" in ALL functions.

lua doesn't care whether there's a semicolon or not.
Remove the "end" before "else" in ALL functions.

I already said that this doesn't help.

Go into the Lua script editor and fix all the errors it reports. And, indeed, remove the extra "end" statements, and then see what the console says...

Same here.

it can't be the same. If you remove the unnecessary "end" before "else" in line 47, the script should have flagged the next function the next time. (it has the same error, actually.)

Added 1 minute ago
in general, I don't see any other significant errors. (in this function). I often write like that myself.

But it doesn't work!!

What does that have to do with it working? I'm talking about a bug that needs to be fixed. And you're talking about work...

I keep fixing it, but it still doesn't work!

So, does it still produce the same error, even after the fix? That can't be. The error in the panel has changed. And it will need to be fixed as well...

So, does it still produce the same error, even after the fix?

Yes. The same error.

Now it's getting more interesting.

That is, the first code entry and the second, but without "end," produce the same error in the console.
Strange.

Perhaps you are not saving the script after making the correction?
Another option: are you starting the map from scratch, or from a save? If from a save, it is not updated, so changes to the map are not relevant to it....

1) I definitely save it. 2) Start over.

I don't know then, I'll be frank with you. If a different error occurred, I would understand. But since it's **exactly the same...** Maybe it still differs from the original? For example, a different line (not 47). You have the same thing in the next function too....