Posts from Forum

It should be understood as the idea that esotericism is the opiate of the masses.

[
So, according to you, blatant rudeness, aggression, and malice are normal?
The fact that this uncouth, unmannered boor insults all people who, in one way or another, believe in God, in a Higher Power – smears them with dirt, mixes them with excrement – for no reason whatsoever – is that normal in your opinion?

You are once again slapping labels and turning everything upside down. All that he wrote about the people you are talking about is: "Okay, religion. If someone wants to believe in a cosmic alien Jew, let them continue to believe. But the situation with esotericism is completely different... All the rest in his article can be expressed by a quote from the article itself - "Esotericism is humiliating for an enlightened, sane person." And I specifically agree with:
1. "Moreover, they criminally try to justify their nonsense with scientific methodology: on the Internet you can find thousands of films, supposedly proving the existence of the soul, chakras, subtle bodies, and other nonsense" - by the way, you are doing the same thing;
2. "How can a person in the 21st century seriously believe that his life depends on the name he was given, on a distant planet that began to influence him from the moment he learned about it? Wear amulets, believing that they attract mythical energy? Or sit in a special pose to connect to higher realms?";
3. "How can one think that some shamans and gurus who lived in ancient times could know more about the world and about a person than modern scientists who have split the atom and deciphered the human genome?";
4. "We have come to this. A country that sent the first person into space is sliding into a new Middle Ages.";
5. "Esotericism is a surrogate spirituality. When esotericists say that they are spiritually developed, I want to answer: "No, you are just mentally ill."
6. "Any person who has at least one convolution in his brain understands: to believe that the position of the planets in the sky or the lines on the palm of the hand affects the fate of people is to admit one's own ignorance. Using esoteric nonsense in one's life is as stupid and shameful as believing an adult that Santa Claus exists or that children appear because they are brought by storks."
7. "Will these "spiritual" people build spaceships? Invent a cure for cancer? Create masterpieces of art? Obviously not. Because instead of brains, rotten mush is bubbling under their skulls, in which words like "aura," "astral," "chakras," "karma," "soul," and "spirituality" float like..." - I agree, it was said harshly, but again, it's not about a grandmother in a church.
It would be fine if each person chose their own path and carried their own cross, the problem is that many are forced to follow someone else's path and carry someone else's cross, and that's what these "preachers" are talking about. Then some burn themselves alive with their children, others, again, drag their children into the dugouts they have dug and begin to die there from unsanitary conditions and diseases, others zombify young girls, and then put suicide belts on them and send them to die, instead of them (the girls) giving birth and raising children, one could give many more examples.

The article is very naive; it won't prove anything to esotericists. It will only resonate with those who are not sympathetic to this trend. And Oelm probably meant that the article has a poor start, and some of the concepts criticized in it are used not only in esotericism but also in Christianity, for example. Although, it's possible that esotericism gives the concepts of "soul" and "spirituality" a different meaning than Christianity; I don't know if that's the case, but if it is, then the article makes more sense, but it still won't convince esotericists.
Ah, back then, sects were something else... Like the Jansenists. But now, they're just a joke.

it definitely won't convince any esotericists.

The person expressed their opinion; I don't think they were trying to convince esotericists.

I already understand that you are an atheist. But are you sure that your mother, grandmother, great-grandmother, father, grandfather, and children won't end up on his list for "freezing"?
There are people who are beyond reason and only understand the language of force, and it's useless to explain anything to them.
Let him say this to the face of some master of sports in combat sambo who himself believes in God, and whose parents, grandmother, and grandfather also believe! He'll immediately swallow his words. And all his arrogance will turn into zero.

I am not an atheist; leave your stereotypes for your flock. We simply have different gods and different concepts of faith. My gods are my mother, grandmother, great-grandmother, father, grandfather, and children. My faith is justice, conscience, honor, integrity, love, compassion, and respect... that's what I believe in.
P.S. As for the "spitting out of teeth," it's not original and, moreover, has been widely practiced by "fighters for faith" since ancient times, only then it's not about teeth, but about hundreds of thousands of lives lost, people who think differently and believe in a different god.

Well, I mean, it looks... Bland. The ideas are very simple, the main concept being "science is cool, esotericism is not." Yes, that's true, and it's obvious to everyone. But the idea of esotericism is exactly the opposite: "esotericism is cool, science is not." It's like arguing with someone who says elephants can fly, and you tell them that elephants can't fly.
Wait, this sounds familiar...

I read the article being discussed, and it clearly presents a one-sided view of things, I would even say a biased one. It feels like the author's sister/wife/mother was influenced by people from some kind of cult, and now he's lumping everyone together.

Not "isoterica", but "esoterica"! ;)

Let him say that to the face of any master of sports in combat sambo..! He'll immediately spit out his teeth.

Well, what did I say today about stones?! ;)
And the beating and even physical destruction of those who have different views - humanity has already gone through this (and is still observed in some places)!
And once again, for the particularly gifted: the quoted article distinguishes between the concepts of "religion" and "esotericism", and does so in a very accessible way.

You guys have a lot of fun here :)

So, according to you, blatant rudeness, aggression, and malice are normal?
The fact that this uncouth and ill-mannered boor insults all people who, in one way or another, believe in God, in a Higher Power – smears them with dirt, mixes them with excrement – without any reason – is that normal in your opinion?

And is it normal to humiliate Jews just because they were born as Jews? With your gigantic posts, you try to portray yourself as a spiritual person, but in reality, I see that you are simpler than three rubles.

"Pride is my favorite of all sins" (c) Devil (Al Pacino)

It's not "isoteric," but "esoteric"! ;)

Well, what did I say today about stones?! ;)
And the persecution and even physical destruction of those who hold different views – humanity has already gone through this (and it is still observed in some places)!
And once again, for the particularly gifted: the quoted article distinguishes between the concepts of "religion" and "esotericism," and it does so very clearly.

Distinguishes? In this article, he mixes esotericism and religion together indiscriminately. Apparently, you don't understand what esotericism is.
In any religion, in any science, in any field of knowledge, there are both exoteric and esoteric aspects.

Yes. If a person allows himself to mix people with dirt, without any restraint, it is useless to try to explain anything to him, and he himself will not stop.

The language of power is the only language that such people understand.
A bad peace is better than a good war.

The duty of the Brahmins, the priests, is non-violence in all circumstances. The duty of the Kshatriya, the warrior, is to protect moral and ethical principles. The Kshatriya is forced, must commit violence. Just as a father punishes his child for his own good. Similarly, the Kshatriya must stop the discrediting of religious principles. And this "person" is exactly what he is doing.

In this case, such a person can only be stopped by force.
If a person allows himself to mix people with dirt just because he doesn't like their views, and does so in such a way, then words are useless in this case.

You can explain something to a reasonable person.

So, you think he has the right to insult and mix anyone with dirt?! And if someone tries to stop him, that is unacceptable violence! But what he is doing is perfectly acceptable?

This is roughly the same as if someone insults your father and mother, you should definitely try to appeal to the person's reason, but if it is useless and the person does not stop in his rude behavior, then the only argument for people who have no limits is force. The aggressor will persist until he receives a worthy rebuff. In this case, force is necessary in order to stop his rudeness.

If this journalist comes to your home and starts mixing your father and mother, wife, and children with dirt, will you calmly stand aside?

My opinion is that such a person should be stopped as soon as possible, and he can only be stopped by force.

But is it okay to humiliate Jews just because they were born that way? With giant posts, you are trying to portray yourself as a spiritual person, but in reality, I see that you are cheaper than three rubles.

"Pride is my favorite of my sins" (c) Devil (Al Pacino)

Humiliate Jews? They themselves will humiliate anyone, which is essentially what they are doing to the whole world.

I call them cannibals not because they were born Jews, but in accordance with their cannibalistic actions.

I don't know, you just have to be blind not to see what is happening in Russia now.

Russia has now reached 18.5 liters of alcohol consumed per capita per year. At 14 liters, the irreversible decline of the nation as such begins. Professor Zhdanov travels around the cities of Russia and simply shouts that an alcohol terror is taking place against the Russian people. And who is intoxicating Russia? Those who are in power! Well, it just so happened that they are all Jews. What do I have to do with it?

That is, they are intoxicating people, increasing the army of drug addicts, homeless people, and the unemployed every year. And the one who writes about this is to blame. But they are good.

All the media in Russia now are in the hands of Jews, and they are all aimed at creating a positive image of Jews, an image of a victim, convincing people that Jews are being unfairly and unjustly accused and hated everywhere.

But please answer why throughout history

I have no hatred for them, I only write about those Jews who are involved in the genocide of the Russian people.
I know a holy man who is a Jew, and I treat him with great respect.

I write about cannibalistic actions – about the people who commit them, and it just so happens that they are Jews. What do I have to do with it?

I'm writing about cannibalistic acts – about the people who commit them, and it just so happens that they are Jewish. What do I have to do with it?

What does their being Jewish have to do with it? There are plenty of non-Jews who commit cannibalistic acts. How can you judge a person based on the physical form they were born into? Your stupidity amazes me, and your attempts to gain attention with kilometer-long posts are amusing. How can you even think about God when you don't understand elementary things?

I'm not Jewish myself, guys, don't get the wrong idea: peka :

You are labeling things again and turning everything upside down. Everything he wrote about the people you're talking about is: "Fine, religion. If someone wants to believe in a Jewish alien, let them keep believing. With esotericism, however, the situation is completely different... Everything else in his article can be expressed by a quote from the article itself - "Esotericism is humiliating for an enlightened, sane person".. But what I specifically agree with is:
1. "Moreover, they criminally attempt to justify their nonsense with scientific methodology: thousands of films can be found on the internet allegedly proving the existence of the soul, chakras, subtle bodies, and other rubbish - by the way, you are doing the same thing;
2. "How can a 21st-century person seriously believe that their life depends on the name they were given, or on a distant planet that began to influence them from the moment they learned about it? Wear amulets, believing that they attract mythical energy? Or sit in a special pose to connect with higher spheres?";
3. "How is it even possible to think that some shaman-gurus who lived in an antediluvian era could know more about the world and man than modern scientists, who have split the atom and decoded the human genome?";
4. "We've come to this. The country that sent the first man into space is sliding back into a new Middle Ages.";
5. "Esotericism is a surrogate spirituality. When esoterics say they are spiritually developed, I want to answer: 'No, you are simply mentally ill'."
6. "Any person with even one wrinkle in their brain understands: believing that the position of planets in the sky or lines on the palm affect people's fate is an admission of one's own ignorance. Using esoteric nonsense in one's life is as stupid and shameful as convincing an adult that Father Frost exists or that children appear because storks bring them."
7. "Will these 'spiritual' people build starships? Invent a cure for cancer? Create masterpieces of art? Obviously not. Because under their skull boxes, instead of brains, there is a rotting sludge bubbling in which words like 'aura', 'astral', 'chakras', 'karma', 'soul', 'spirituality' float like sh..". - I agree it was said harshly, but again, not about the grandmother in church.

You are such a good boy!
You accuse me of labeling, while you yourself have already covered me entirely with mindless, baseless labels.

Everything you write shows that you simply do not understand what esotericism is and what religion is - true religion.

True religion is the eternal debt of the soul, of a living being, of a human before God. And every religion has both an exoteric part and an esoteric part.

One cannot oppose Esotericism and Religion - it is simply incorrect. Because Esotericism consists of deeper knowledge within any religion.

In his article, while mocking and dragging esotericism through the mud - perhaps not understanding it himself, or perhaps understanding it perfectly well while dragging it through the mud - he drags the esoteric part of the knowledge of Christianity, Islam, the Vedas, and Buddhism through the mud. It's possible the person simply doesn't understand what he is writing about. Or perhaps he is working on commission.

1) Here he effectively claims that there is no soul. While all cultures and religions of the world speak of its existence - essentially, here he discredits and drags through the mud all world religions and, consequently, the people who profess these religions. But for some reason, he considers himself a priori better than all those he writes about!

And following the logic of Marmot and yours - under no circumstances can anything be said to him, or can he be stopped. That is, he has the right to behave like a pig. And the people he drags through the mud have no right to object.

Violence, naturally, must never be used to achieve one's own selfish goals, but this is a completely different situation. If a person does not understand that they cannot behave this way - how do you explain it to them? If a child doesn't obey you, what do you do? Do you punish them? Well, that' same "inhumane", isn't it!?

If he only insulted me - personally me, it could be endured, but if he starts calling people dear to me stupid—friends, mother, father—then my deep conviction is that it is my duty to protect the people dear to me.

This journalist claims that the soul, chakras, karma, and the subtle body are all rubbish and own nonsense - which speaks to his complete ignorance on this matter.

At the same time, he provides no proof for his words. He simply, like you, mindlessly applies labels and clichés (this is nonsense, this is rubbish, this is garbage) - only because it does not correspond to his beliefs. And where is the proof that it is rubbish? I ask you the same: where is the proof that all this is nonsense?

If you, like him, believe and claim that there is no soul, subtle body, law of karma, or chakra system (the Kirlian device clearly shows the presence of a chakra system in a person's subtle body) - be so kind as to provide at least some arguments or evidence in favor of this. Otherwise, there is no possibility of having a constructive dialogue with you. Because all your labels are not supported by a single argument. You simply stupidly call nonsense that which does not fit into your understanding, while providing no proof whatsoever. You have a very convenient position.

2) Here this "journalist," just like you, stupidly and without proof denies everything that doesn't fit in his head or his understanding.

Where is even one piece of evidence for what he claims in point 2? Correct—just as with you and him, there is none!!!

3) Here again he makes mindless and baseless assertions that people in the past were stupid, uneducated - ignorant, while modern scientists are the very peak of human evolution.

Yet Vedic literature, specifically "Vimanika Shastra" written more than 5000 years ago, describes flying machines so perfect that modern science could only dream of them.

The father of modern rocket technology, Wernher von Braun, did not invent or create his V1 and V2 rockets - he took them from "Vimanika Shastra".

The city of Mohenjo-daro was destroyed by atomic weapons more than 5000 years ago. If people in the past were so antediluvian, where did they get atomic weapons?

Ayurveda describes how medics of the past performed open-brain surgeries to remove cancerous tumors with subsequent regrowth of skull bone and skin. Such operations cannot be done even by modern medicine.

He calls himself and modern scientists geniuses, while for some reason groundlessly belittling people of the past, implicitly calling them dimwits. But everyone thinks of others as they are themselves.

This person simply has a damaged sense of self-worth; that is why he tries to assert himself by humiliating and insulting other people. But this is nothing other than the psychology of a slave and a coward.

And I believe that in the past, there lived people who were at least no less intelligent.

Where is even one piece of evidence that people in the past could not know more than we know now? Of course, it depends on which past we are talking about. More than 5000 years ago, civilizations existed that were far more advanced both spiritually and technically. And excavations of ancient cities, such as Mohenjo-daro, although indirectly, still confirm this. This city was destroyed by nuclear weapons - meaning they already existed then. And if the civilizations of the past had nuclear weapons, it means they were also very advanced in other areas of life and activity; at the very least, they were not inferior to our civilization.

4) Here he calls esotericism a Middle Age! But esoteric knowledge is only part of some religion.
And have the laws of God or the laws of nature changed since then?

In the Mahabharata and Ramayana, it is described that 5000 years ago people flew into space on vimanas without any problems at all. But we naturally do not believe this. Otherwise, we would have to admit that civilizations of the past were even more advanced technically than our modern civilization. And that is a blow to the ego. We want to think that it is specifically we who are the most technically developed civilization - because that flatters our vanity and brings us a sense of satisfaction.

5) Esotericism is simply deeper knowledge in any religion, in any science. He simply does not know the definition of the words.

Let people engage in esotericism - what have they done to him? Why does he bark at them like a mad dog off its chain?

Make a fool pray to God and he'll crack his forehead! Any idea, even the most reasonable and correct one, can be distorted to the point of madness.

That is the reason why some people burn themselves alive (committing suicide), while others go underground, walling themselves in with children in unsanitary conditions. It's not about religion or esotericism - but a wrong understanding of both. No religion and its deeper part of knowledge - esotericism - gives a person such advice.

Of course, the word "esotericism" can be understood in another sense.

6) Here again he mindlessly and without proof claims that astrology is nonsense and own rubbish. He claims that planets cannot influence human life - thereby admitting his own ignorance.

If we don't know some laws or patterns, it doesn't mean those laws and patterns don't exist!

Has anyone ever seen a magnetic field?! No? Does that mean it doesn't exist? Magnets repel each other - but nothing is visible.

Any person can be convinced that planets very much influence our lives through very simple examples.

- ) I think no one will argue that sunlight coming from the sun strongly affects everything that happens on earth; without it, there would be no plants or forests, and consequently no food or air.

- ) It is also a well-known fact that the moon affects tides - which in turn affects people's well-being.

- ) Changes in solar activity also affect blood pressure and general human well-being.

- ) Also, planets influence people in other ways - all of this is described in the science of astrology.

He, like me and most people, is not qualified in astrology; he doesn't understand a damn thing about it, just as we don't - but at the same time, he draws very strange conclusions that astrology is nonsense.
Where is the proof that it is nonsense?

7)

Will these "spiritual" people build starships? Invent a cure for cancer? Create masterpieces of art? Obviously not.


7) Here he lumps together people practicing esotericism and simply religious people (because any religious person is convinced that there is a soul, that there are laws of God, specifically the law of karma), whereas before he claimed that all who believe in the existence of the soul and the laws of God are lost idiots with same own brains instead of matter, and moreover suggests freezing all religious people to death.

(The law of karma is a specific instance of the laws of God, which more simply than anything else explains why we suffer, why some are lucky and happy while others are not, why some are rich and others poor).

7.1) Starship? In a section of the Vedas such as "Vimanika Shastra," all existing flying machines are described. And based on the knowledge of a sage - a holy person - one can indeed build a spaceship.

7.2) Masterpieces? As a rule, all masterpieces of music, painting, and literary works were created specifically by deeply religious people. And this is not a stone in the garden of atheists. These are historical facts, which can be verified by reading the biographies of Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, Goethe, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc.

7.3) Cancer? Ayurveda long ago described how to defeat cancer; cancer is the result of grievances of varying depths. A grievance that has reached the level of self-hatred is a benign tumor. A grievance that has reached the level of hatred toward another person is a malignant tumor. Forgiveness is the cure for cancer.

__
And he speaks as if modern medicine has already defeated cancer?!
Is that so?

There are entire scientific studies on how life lines on the hands and feet of people change depending on what kind of lifestyle they lead.

A red thread running through all his messages is that he is undoubtedly the smartest and a priori better than all those whom he mindlessly and without proof insults and belittles.

Probably in childhood he was bullied, not cared for, not loved; that's why he grew up as bitter as a dog toward the whole world. For the most part, he should be pitied. Because he is a deeply unhappy person. Can a happy person insult, humiliate, and wish death to people so bitterly - people who have personally done nothing to him, simply based on the fact that they have different ideas? And who are not hostile toward him.

Moreover, all his insults and assertions are baseless!
In his entire article, I didn't see a single constructive argument in favor of what he says. Only malice, insults, and groundless accusations and assertions.

Everything would have been fine if every person chose their own path and carried their own cross; the problem is that many are pushed to walk someone else's path and carry someone else's cross—these "preachers" are what we are talking about.

Alone? And what about mom and dad who carried their cross for you, me, us?
What about the teachers who taught us patiently in school?

So many people help us carry our life's cross through life?!

There is no such thing as "alone"! Only a proud and ungrateful person speaks this way.

Historical-Allegory:
"One night, a man had a dream.
He dreamed that he was walking along the seashore,
Strolling, and God was walking beside him, while images from his life flashed across the sky.
And in each such image from the sky, he saw two pairs of footprints walking side by side.
One pair was his, and the second was God's.
And the man looked back at his tracks and noticed that many times there was only one pair of footprints.
And he also noticed that specifically in the most unhappy and sad images of his life, there was only one pair of footprints.
The man turned to God and asked:
- Oh God, you said that if I decided to walk your way, you would walk with me throughout the entire journey, but in the hardest moments of my life, there are tracks of only one pair of feet.
And I do not understand why, when I needed you most, you left me?
And God answered him:
- Oh my son, I love you and will never leave you.
And those moments when you suffered so much, when you see only one pair of footprints
THOSE WERE NOT YOUR FOOTPRINTS
THOSE WERE MY FOOTPRINTS, WHEN I CARRIED YOU IN MY ARMS."
___________________________________

As a rule, people become atheists (become disillusioned with life) because of some very difficult life situations, shocks, or failures. For example, due to the death of a loved one.

Do you think you chose your own life's cross? Do you think society, media, television - the people you have communicated and communicate with - had no influence on your choice? Whether for better or worse.

And are you sure that you are now carrying your own cross? And not one that was imposed on you by the media, the godless Soviet "culture" during which almost everyone was convinced that there is and cannot be any God, and those who were not convinced were rotted in camps. You speak as if all religious people are confused people carrying someone else's cross. And all atheists undoubtedly chose the right path and carry their own godless right cross.

You will of course say that you chose this path, this cross yourself! But do you not allow for the thought that hundreds of factors about which you, I, we don't even know or suspect could have influenced your, my, our choice?!

And how in your opinion does one determine their own cross in life?

Please tell me, what is your cross? What meaning do you see in your life? And what do you think will happen to you after death? And what is worth doing in life and what is not?

Then some burn themselves alive together with their children, others, again, drag their children into dugouts they've own holes and start dying there from unsanitary conditions and diseases, thirds brainwash young girls, and then put suicide belts on them and send them to die, instead of them (the girls) giving birth to and raising children; one could provide a heap more examples.

And does this not happen to ordinary people living in the city? Can't they die from unsanitary conditions or fire? And those young girls who simply weren't raised by parents in ordinary city families and grew up loose, as a result of which they became prostitutes—how can they be helped? They are not part of any sects; they live an ordinary simple city life, but for some reason the same things happen to them!

Every day on the planet, tens of millions of people die.
But at the same time, everyone thinks: well, I certainly won't die tomorrow!
And therefore every day we live for empty pleasures and whims.
And we don't think about what will happen to us after death?
This is a very interesting question—what happens to us after death? The end? Then what are all the struggles and efforts for? To feed the worms?


_____________________
Make a fool pray to God and he'll crack his forehead! Any idea, even the most reasonable and correct one, can be distorted to the point of madness.

That is the reason why some people burn themselves alive (committing suicide), while others go underground, walling themselves in with children in unsanitary conditions. Girls falling under the influence of sects as ex

It's not about religion or esotericism - but a wrong understanding of both. No religion and its deeper part of knowledge - esotericism - gives a person such advice.

Of course, the word "esotericism" can be understood in another sense.
But then one must first agree on terminology. And only then make some statements of a rude, insulting nature.

____
If someone insults me personally, I am ready to endure that (which I do here endlessly), but if someone mindlessly and without proof insults people dear to me—for example, mother, father, people whose books improved my relationship with my wife—I will not endure it; I will fight to the end. And this is my deep conviction. To God what is God's and to Caesar what is Caesar's. If a person behaves rudely, let them be ready to answer for their words. But on the internet, everyone is very brave.

but if someone mindlessly and thoughtlessly insults people dear to me, ...people whose books have improved my relationship with my wife, I will not tolerate it, I will fight to the end.

Added to the collection)))

1) What does it have to do with them being Jews? There are plenty of non-Jews who commit cannibalistic acts. 2) How can you judge a person based on the physical shell they were born into? 3) Your stupidity amazes me, and your attempts to be trendy with kilometer-long posts are amusing. 4) Why reflect on God when you don't understand basic things?

I'm not a Jew myself, boys, don't think badly of me : peka :

1) Of all the cannibalistic acts I am aware of (and I am aware of many), there are no more cruel and treacherous acts committed specifically by Jews. It's not about the fact that they are specifically Jews. I know a holy man who is Jewish by nationality. I have Jewish acquaintances who told me themselves about the horrors Jews committed in Palestine—slaughtering entire villages there, including women, old people, and children!

And why did they do it? Because it is written in black and white in the Talmud, in the Kabbalah—in the Shulchan Aruch. That they are the children of God and all other goyim are two-legged animals—sub-humans. This can be verified by going to any synagogue and asking for the Russian version of the Kabbalah or Shulchan Aruch.

Moreover, in the "Bible of Origen," Christ tells the scribes and Pharisees—the Jews—that you are children of the devil, and your father is Satan.
If you don't believe it, find this version of the Bible and read it.

In Vedic literature, the Serpent Kaliya—who is described in the Bible as the serpent tempter, the devil—tells the sages gathered in the Naimesharanya forest to stop the destructive influence of the Kali Yuga (the age in which we all currently live): "that I spread my destructive influence through Adam's (Jewish) tribe." The principle of Kali—"Divide and Rule"—seems similar to how revolutions take place in Arab countries?

Now the entire Russian government consists entirely of Jews. Every year 300 billion dollars are taken out of Russia—from the resource-extraction industry. Natural resources belong to the people according to the constitution. But all this money is taken abroad and poured into the European and American economies. And the Russian people are left with nothing.

The Dulles Plan, as Olm proved, does not exist, but despite this, for some reason it is working: the number of drug addicts is increasing, the people are drinking themselves to death, the youth are being corrupted, Madonna comes to Moscow and convinces everyone from the stage that being a faggot or a lesbian is perfectly normal! Are there even any factories left that actually produce something? Only resource-extraction enterprises remain! Agriculture is completely destroyed; now if the West stops food supplies, famine may begin. Store shelves will be empty in a week at most. Education has also been brought to the point of absurdity.
And Vovachka and Medvedev say on TV that everything is fine, everything is growing, developing, and improving!

If this Dulles Plan is nonsense and rubbish, slander—then why is everything described there happening exactly now in Russia?

2) Well, why do you think I judge them by their shell—by their body, by birth? I said that I judge them by their actions, and not everyone indiscriminately, but specifically those cannibals who are currently betraying Russia!
At the moment, 89 million people are left in Russia, instead of the official 140!

If I am, as you say, slandering them without basis, then why are you afraid that you'll be mistaken for a Jew??? :confused:

______
Please tell me why they were constantly expelled from different countries throughout almost 2 thousand years???

414 AD. Jews were expelled from Alexandria.

1012 they were expelled from Germany.

1182 from France.

1290 from England.

1306 Jews are expelled from France; after some time they were allowed to return, however, in 1394 they were expelled again.

1492 from Spain.

1614 from Frankfurt.

1744 from Prague.

1891 from Moscow

Before the Revolution of 17 in Russia, there existed the so-called Pale of Settlement—which forbade Jews from holding any leadership positions.

In the Soviet Union, shortly before his death, Stalin planned the expulsion of Jews from the European part of Russia—which is why he was rubbed out, poisoned.

3) What exactly is the stupidity that amazes you? Please provide an example:

- stupidity #1, why it is stupidity, and your view on the matter.
- stupidity #2, why it is stupidity, and your view on the matter.
and so on.

I write about what interests me, and I force no one to read.

If I were writing in order to be trendy—I would have stopped writing long ago. Given the amount of negativity I receive from it.

4) I am interested in reflecting on God. I am telling my view on the matter; if you disagree with them, please, I don't mind.
Share your view, your ideas about God, I will listen with pleasure.

For example, answer the question:
Does the incredible complexity of our organism—the most complex biochemical system—at least indirectly in your view suggest that it must have an intelligent creator? Or could our organism have arisen as a result of chemical reactions?

Added after 3 minutes

For the collection)))

Then I should add it in full:

If someone insults me personally, that is something I am ready to tolerate (which I do here endlessly), but if someone mindlessly and without proof insults people dear to me, for example mom, dad, people whose books improved, eased my life, my relationship with my wife (previously she argued with me until she was blue in the face because her mother argued until she was blue in the face with her father)—I will not tolerate it, I will fight to the end. And this is my deep conviction. Give to God what is God's and to Caesar what is Caesar's. If a person behaves like a boor, then let them be ready to answer for their words. But on the internet, everyone is very brave.