Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The article is very naive; it won't prove anything to esotericists. It will only resonate with those who are not sympathetic to this trend. And Oelm probably meant that the article has a poor start, and some of the concepts criticized in it are used not only in esotericism but also in Christianity, for example. Although, it's possible that esotericism gives the concepts of "soul" and "spirituality" a different meaning than Christianity; I don't know if that's the case, but if it is, then the article makes more sense, but it still won't convince esotericists. Ah, back then, sects were something else... Like the Jansenists. But now, they're just a joke.