Auto-translated
the heroes are developing in the right direction:D
RomarioGrom
Posts from Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Javdet
Auto-translated
By the way, while the MOD is still under development, I suggest adding chess directly into the battles between players.
Marmot
Auto-translated
Wow, what an interesting topic! I thought I was already spending a lot of time when a single (not always final) difficult battle lasts up to half an hour! :) And here – this! No, there definitely should be some kind of reasonable time limit for the entire battle and for each round in the rules, even if it's not a timer! Otherwise, the opponent will get nervous and start wondering: what's going on, did he fall asleep or something?! And what if it's late, or what if he has to go to work/school tomorrow? Let's say, one hour (60 minutes) for the entire battle and up to 15 minutes per round? For example, can a player either win in 4-5 rounds by thinking carefully, or in many rounds by thinking quickly?
dnaop-wr
Auto-translated
In a real battle, they wouldn't let you think for so long – maybe until dawn, but once the battle starts, you only have minutes to think and make decisions. :smile19:
Qwerty
Auto-translated
The actual question is as follows:
1. Should members of the Arbitration Committee hold their positions for life?
2. Should members of the Arbitration Committee be elected?
1. Should members of the Arbitration Committee hold their positions for life?
2. Should members of the Arbitration Committee be elected?
numOne
Auto-translated
The poll is flawed, Qwerty. It's biased.
Please ask the questions correctly:
- Members of the Arbitration Committee should be appointed by the current Arbitration Committee.
- Members of the Arbitration Committee should be elected by the forum.
No one intends to stay here for life.
And it would be desirable to make it open so that there are no meaningless manipulations.
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
I've edited the survey questions. It's unclear why it's closed, though.
Initially, the Arbitration Committee (AK) members were re-elected, but no one seemed eager to join the AK, so they decided to appoint new members and replenish the ranks as other members left.
Qwerty
Auto-translated
Sasha, this is a tricky situation. Remember how Vikk used to dominate everything with the Academy? And now I'm thinking: we need new people. For example, kalababa. He has a great track record in tournaments, and he's shown that you can play Heroes in a more engaging way, on all-random, instead of grinding with the Stronghold on small maps... Or take Sticky Fingaz. He's done a lot, I'd even say a very significant amount.
We need to promote people like that into the Academy.
And the current roster can even be partially kept – so that those who have the TIME, desire, and energy can continue their activities, while those who don't have the time or something else can calmly move on to other things. Well, and if someone finds it difficult to make such a decision on their own, then the community should definitely help.
numOne
Auto-translated
Sasha, this is a tricky situation. Remember how Vikk used to dominate everything with the Academy? And now I'm thinking: we need new people. For example, kalababa. He has a great track record in tournaments, and he's shown that you can play Heroes in a manly way, on all-random, instead of grinding with the Stronghold on small maps... Or take Sticky Fingaz. He's done a lot, I'd even say a lot.
We need to promote such people to the Academy.
And we can even keep the current roster partially – so that those who have TIME, desire, and energy can continue their activities, and those who don't have time or something else can calmly move on to other things. Well, if someone finds it difficult to make such a decision on their own, the community should definitely help.
Have you asked kalababa and Sticky if they want to join the Academy?
I won't even vote, because it doesn't matter how new people are added, as long as there are people to add...
Qwerty
Auto-translated
There's another nuance here: which AK are we talking about? The one that exists now? Where some people don't have enough time (or desire) for full-fledged activity? Or a more dynamic and modern AK?
New people have appeared who are active on the forum. Where is their representative in the AK? And they are good guys, even though they sometimes send me abusive messages in private. They play and stream, which is extremely important. The AK is stuck in time; it needs dynamism...
New people have appeared who are active on the forum. Where is their representative in the AK? And they are good guys, even though they sometimes send me abusive messages in private. They play and stream, which is extremely important. The AK is stuck in time; it needs dynamism...
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
What's the point of arguing? The number of positions in the Academy is not limited. If there are people willing to work, we wouldn't object. BUT WHERE ARE THESE PEOPLE?
Дубровин Павел
Auto-translated
Regarding the Elections... just as with the election of the Forum Administration, so too with the election of Arbitration Committee members.
The reasoning is simple: to give Users the freedom to choose, the freedom to vote for those they trust to resolve their disputes in the Games.
The only concern... will there be any willing candidates? But giving Users the right to choose the Arbitration Committee members will be the right thing to do. If no one is willing, that's okay; the current composition will remain.
Leolopus
Auto-translated
Regarding the Elections... both in the matter of electing the Forum Administration and in the election of members of the Arbitration Committee (AK).
P.S., Pavel meant direct elections for moderators. We won't be overthrowing the king:)
Albert@s
Auto-translated
The current AK is quite representative and highly respected, but is there anyone who would like to join its ranks – so to speak, volunteers? I think if there are any willing and reasonable candidates, no one would object...
Qwerty
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb