Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Regarding the Violation System.Auto-translated
Yes, I agree, 100 points should be awarded for using inappropriate language. No less. There should be no place for this on our forum.
Is there any penalty in your system that is less than 100 points? :) Just a reminder, 100 points equals a ban. And sometimes a person might swear in the heat of the moment; it's unlikely that they should be banned immediately for that. Unless it's the kind of case that Pete described.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
Personally, I don't consider spam and off-topic posts to be a serious violation. Especially not to the point where it warrants a permanent ban. If everything happens without insults or personal attacks, then why punish it? Communication is key!
If a user has accumulated 99 points, they will most likely receive their next point, even if it's not for staying on topic.
Moreover, points for going off-topic are rarely awarded, so it's not a given that even a user with 99 points will receive them. It's more likely that they won't.
4.1. - (For having more than 15% and less than 30% of irrelevant content in a message) 4.2. - (For having more than 15% and less than 30% of off-topic content in a message) 4.3. - (For having more than 30% of irrelevant content in a message) 4.4. - (For having more than 30% of off-topic content in a message)
Remove. Make this one point: for a message that contains nothing but irrelevant/off-topic content. I think it's fair to give 1-5 points.
4.5. - (For creating a repetitive topic on the forum)
Let it be.
4.6. - (For a message containing flame) 4.7. - (For a message containing trolling) 4.9. - (For any direct or indirect insults of users, third parties, or organizations)
Isn't flame an insult? And trolling is not a very clear concept. If I'm in a bad mood, any innocent phrase can "troll" me.
4.15. - (For addressing other users using nicknames different from their original ones, if the user does not like this type of address)
Good point, I like it. However, points should not be given for the first time, but upon recurrence. But then it can be written as trolling.
4.22. - (For publicly discussing the actions of moderators, coordinators, or administrators) 4.23. - (For a false appeal) 4.24. - (For violating the appeal format (any extra messages in the appeal topic that contradict its format as described in the rules))
These points were just added. I think it's enough to slightly reduce the number of points.
And again, you can give points not for one or two times, but for chronic similar behavior. In this case, it makes sense to slightly increase the number.
If a person has accumulated 99 points, they will most likely receive their next point, even if it's not for off-topic content.
I received a large number of points in 2009, and I could easily be banned permanently for receiving just one unfortunate point for the same off-topic content, even after three or four years. This only encourages people to create clones and engage in many other similar activities. If a person maintains an interest in the forum, that's actually a good thing. And I can say for sure that such people are much more beneficial to the forum than those who visit it once every few months, or even less frequently. If necessary, it is enough to block the account for a certain period of time, and that's all.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
Dubrovin Pavel, did some moderator offend you badly? Insult you? Intentionally and biasedly assign you points? Why do you keep suggesting such measures? The moderators who are actually keeping order are already almost cornered. What kind of forum do you want to see? Something like Lukmorie? Or a good and cultured forum?...
No)) You can see that no points were assigned to me....
In my opinion, freedom of speech (opinion) is more important...than a subjective punitive measure. Moderators correcting posts (including offensive ones)... is better than restricting opinions through an imaginary stick...
Note...I am suggesting removing some items from the System of Violations...I realize that freedom of speech should not lead to the violation of the rights of the other side.
Zybr
