Regarding the Violation System.

Auto-translated

4.1. - (For having more than 15% and less than 30% of irrelevant content in a message)
4.2. - (For having more than 15% and less than 30% of off-topic content in a message)
4.3. - (For having more than 30% of irrelevant content in a message)
4.4. - (For having more than 30% of off-topic content in a message)

Remove. Make this one point: for a message that contains nothing but irrelevant/off-topic content. I think it's fair to give 1-5 points.

4.5. - (For creating a repetitive topic on the forum)

Let it be.

4.6. - (For a message containing flame)
4.7. - (For a message containing trolling)
4.9. - (For any direct or indirect insults of users, third parties, or organizations)

Isn't flame an insult? And trolling is not a very clear concept. If I'm in a bad mood, any innocent phrase can "troll" me.

4.15. - (For addressing other users using nicknames different from their original ones, if the user does not like this type of address)

Good point, I like it. However, points should not be given for the first time, but upon recurrence. But then it can be written as trolling.

4.22. - (For publicly discussing the actions of moderators, coordinators, or administrators)
4.23. - (For a false appeal)
4.24. - (For violating the appeal format (any extra messages in the appeal topic that contradict its format as described in the rules))

These points were just added. I think it's enough to slightly reduce the number of points.

And again, you can give points not for one or two times, but for chronic similar behavior. In this case, it makes sense to slightly increase the number.

А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕

Reading content in

Interface language