HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

Posts from Which is better, attacking or defending?

General
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
Is it better to focus on attack or defense?
58 voters
Single choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
Offline Academy ward
Registered:
Posts: 68
#16
Auto-translated
I only play on the computer; I don't have time, and some maps take more than a week to complete...
Yes, I think so too, but I still hope that at least someone manages to reach 30 knowledge points sometimes.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline FineCut
Registered:
Posts: 29
#17
Auto-translated
I think getting 30 knowledge points is quite achievable. A lot also depends on the artifacts and the presence of education.
1
⚖️
0
In reply to FineCut
User Avatar
Offline **AnGeL**
Registered:
Posts: 45
#18
Auto-translated
Well, I always choose attack and defense, and there's really nothing to debate here – defense is better. You can always take down an opponent, but how do you counter an opponent with a larger army? The answer is defense, which also helps preserve as many creatures as possible in battle. Attack gives a 5%, 10%, or 15% damage increase, while defense provides twice as much – a 10%, 20%, or 30% damage reduction.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Кировчанин
Registered:
Posts: 25
#19
Auto-translated
You need to upgrade the defense of the Mages and Necropolis – one faction will overwhelm everyone with spells, and the other will raise all the fallen. It’s better for the other factions to focus on attack.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Liiion
Registered:
Posts: 174
#20
Auto-translated
Defense is the best. Defense reduces damage by 30%, while attack only increases damage by 15%.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Ment
Registered:
Posts: 41,374
#21
Auto-translated
I once voted for defense, but that's not quite right. It all depends on the faction you're playing as (and the overall situation). For Necropolis, for example, defense is better. But when playing as Haven, getting an attack bonus is a huge advantage, especially considering the great tactics and ranged attacks! And so on, there's a lot to discuss here.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Ment
User Avatar
Offline Liiion
Registered:
Posts: 174
#22
Auto-translated
Ment
I once voted for defense, but that's not right. It all depends on the faction you're playing as (and the overall situation). For Necropolis, for example, defense is better. But when playing as Haven, getting an attack bonus is a big advantage, especially considering the great tactics and ranged attacks! And so on, there's a lot to discuss here.

so, some races need defense, while others need attack.
0
⚖️
0
Offline Kalisa
Registered:
Posts: 17
#23
Auto-translated
In my opinion, Attack is better.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Kalisa
User Avatar
Offline Rainer
Registered:
Posts: 645
#24
Auto-translated
Kalisa
In my opinion, Attack is better.
So:
1) For Necropolis – defense
2) For Academy – 50% defense, 50% attack
3) Elves also 50% defense and attack
4) Fortress – defense
5) Humans – attack (their hero is built for defense)
6) Inferno – defense (it’s very weak, but their attack is decent)
7) Stronghold – attack (since their units are built entirely for defense)
8) Stronghold – they need both ;)
P.S.: Based on all this, the conclusion is: defense is preferable.

Added after 33 seconds
The topic can be closed.
1
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Ment
Registered:
Posts: 41,374
#25
Auto-translated
7) Dwarves, attack (since their units are entirely focused on defense).
So, their not-so-large damage will increase by 15%, and what? The tactic provides little benefit, and shooting is almost useless, except perhaps for fire arrows. But reducing the damage received by 30% + additional skills, considering that they already take little damage, can turn tanks into super tanks.
The topic can be closed.
This is a poll; let people express their opinions.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Ment
User Avatar
Offline dzhalib
Registered:
Posts: 52
#26
Auto-translated
I think mages need more defense. Offense can be slightly compensated with artifacts.
компьтер- это почти человек. единственное отличие: ему не свойственно сваливать свои ошибки на другой компьютер
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Ritter Elf
Registered:
Posts: 50
#27
Auto-translated
Ideally, both should be at roughly the same level, as both attack and defense are necessary to defeat the enemy.
Мои карты "Свобода Эльфов","Железный Молот","Хан Мангур или Седьмой Дракон".Вернулся к героям после годового передыха)))буду делать новые карты,пишите,вместе поделаем)
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline GUM2-1997
Registered:
Posts: 27
#28
Auto-translated
I think it's better to focus on attack early in the game! :smile13: :smile13: Then you can improve defense later! :smile28:
0
⚖️
0
Offline d777o
Registered:
Posts: 5
#29
Auto-translated
I'm all for defense! Lots of useful secondary skills, IMHO.
It works great with my favorite factions, Dwarves and Necropolis.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline $an4es
Registered:
Posts: 233
#30
Auto-translated
I also tend to choose defense more often. It has a higher percentage and excellent skills.
0
⚖️
0