Auto-translated
No one here would accept being betrayed. As a result, those who betrayed others were also betrayed, and so on, in a vicious cycle, only increasing the number of victims.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
No one here would accept being betrayed. As a result, those who betrayed others were also betrayed, and so on, in a vicious cycle, only increasing the number of victims.
I'd rather do something useful – standing around with posters just wastes time.
Thank you, Russia.
So, the regime is bad. A good regime would either re-educate the people or change its policies to avoid large-scale casualties.
IT'S TIME FOR GORBACHEV!
Your Nazism would have won even without Stalin, because Russia is a large country, and it simply has more people than Germany. Space exploration is also not the merit of the regime, but of the scientists. Urbanization - hmm, hmm... Agriculture is also something that can be developed.
So, the fact that everything was done under pressure does not mean that it was done better or more.
Five years ago, we thoroughly discussed the essence of this video...
but there's no need to say what Zhirinovsky is saying right now
If the country lived off forests and oil
Heaven, if there were no regime, there would be no USSR either, as you understand
For example,potrowill discuss in the politics thread.
The regime arose from dissatisfaction with the actions of Tsar Nicholas II's government...
Am I speaking like Zhirinovsky? By the way, I didn't vote for him.
Funny. If there hadn't been a change of regime in 1916, I'm sure Russia would be the most powerful country in the world right now. And no one would be trading in timber or oil.
Your conference? What did you decide? What are the plans?
Well... m... These are certainly signs of a good state... Although some of them are not exclusive to the USSR, but... you see... maybe my views are a little bit conservative and far from ideal, but... but... but the state should provide a life full of opportunities and freedoms for every individual, right?... Or not? I think so... m... here... you see... well, and, isn't it... isn't it... does it have anything to do with queues, executions, sending people to camps, petty theft, famine, and a cult of personality?... Maybe I just don't understand something?
Not at all. Then, an uneducated rabble rose up, to whom Lenin and his sect promised all sorts of things. And Stalin came after Lenin. So I don't see any difference between these enemies of the people.
Because you're a drug addict without arguments and with a schoolboy's point of view.
That's a strange conclusion.
But I don't need to pretend to be smart; everyone knows I'm not a skilled player in the forum game "Mafia," so I'm stupid(((
But this advice would suit you better than anyone else!