Alex Ghost
Auto-translated
Well... m... These are certainly signs of a good state... Although some of them are not exclusive to the USSR, but... you see... maybe my views are a little bit conservative and far from ideal, but... but... but the state should provide a life full of opportunities and freedoms for every individual, right?... Or not? I think so... m... here... you see... well, and, isn't it... isn't it... does it have anything to do with queues, executions, sending people to camps, petty theft, famine, and a cult of personality?... Maybe I just don't understand something?
In general, it does - because it's already history. You can say that it was the people who saved us, but someone at the top made decisions about what needed to be done, and what not, and how much money to allocate for it...
Not at all. Then, an uneducated rabble rose up, to whom Lenin and his sect promised all sorts of things. And Stalin came after Lenin. So I don't see any difference between these enemies of the people.
Because you're a drug addict without arguments and with a schoolboy's point of view.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ - конец бесполезным темам