Skip to content

Posts from Early elections on HeroesWorld

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
I vote for...
19 voters
Single choice Closed 2011-12-03
This poll is closed.
F\*\*king Russia
10.5% 2 votes
General catering is fair. Russia
0% 0 votes
LSDpr
5.3% 1 vote
For the motherland, for Stalin, for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation!
0% 0 votes
I vote for ponies
47.4% 9 votes
No, seriously, it's that pink one, with wings
5.3% 1 vote
Alakhanbar! Netama passport!
31.6% 6 votes
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
No one here would accept being betrayed. As a result, those who betrayed others were also betrayed, and so on, in a vicious cycle, only increasing the number of victims.
Therefore, this regime is bad. A good regime would either re-educate people or change its policies to prevent such large-scale casualties.
In reply to Alex Ghost
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Alex Ghost
I'd rather do something useful – standing around with posters just wastes time.
For example, I'll participate in a discussion about politics.
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Well... um... These are certainly signs of a good state... Although some of them are not exclusive to the USSR, but... you see... perhaps my views are a little bit conservative and far from ideal, but... but... after all, the state should ensure a life full of opportunities and freedoms for every individual, right?.. Or not? I think so... um... here... you see... well, and how... how does this relate to queues, executions, sending people to camps, snitching, famine, and a personality cult?.. Maybe I just don't understand something?
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Thank you, Russia.
(((
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
If there hadn't been a regime, there wouldn't have been the USSR, as you understand.
In reply to Siverfale
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Siverfale
So, the regime is bad. A good regime would either re-educate the people or change its policies to avoid large-scale casualties.
We are who we choose. In the end, the regime originated from the same people, not from the bourgeois elite...
WisTrit
IT'S TIME FOR GORBACHEV!
Five years ago, we thoroughly discussed the essence of this video...
Lord Mortulus
Your Nazism would have won even without Stalin, because Russia is a large country, and it simply has more people than Germany. Space exploration is also not the merit of the regime, but of the scientists. Urbanization - hmm, hmm... Agriculture is also something that can be developed.

So, the fact that everything was done under pressure does not mean that it was done better or more.
They would have won without Stalin, but you shouldn't say what Zhirinovsky says now, but what Hitler said then - that the USSR consists only of uncivilized Slavic barbarians...
Indeed, our scientists did everything - how many talented scientists were in Russia and the USSR! Sakharov, the inventor of ICBMs - no American could do that - von Braun was bought specifically for this... If the country lived off forests and oil, like Iran at that time, Russia would not have been a match for Germany...
In reply to Alex Ghost
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Five years ago, we thoroughly discussed the essence of this video...
What about your conference? What did you decide? What are your plans?
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
but there's no need to say what Zhirinovsky is saying right now

And I'm saying, like Zhirinovsky? By the way, I didn't vote for him.
If the country lived off forests and oil

That's funny. If there hadn't been a change of regime in 1916, I'm sure Russia would be the most powerful country in the world right now. And no one would be trading in forests or oil.
In reply to Саня Изи
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Lord Mortulus
Heaven, if there were no regime, there would be no USSR either, as you understand
The regime arose from dissatisfaction with the actions of Nicholas II's government... Lenin, if you know — offered a completely different view on politics than Stalin...
Amko
For example, potro will discuss in the politics thread.
This is also purely for the lulz and without any benefit, because everyone sticks to their guns...
In reply to Alex Ghost
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Because you're an addict with no arguments and a childish attitude.
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
The regime arose from dissatisfaction with the actions of Tsar Nicholas II's government...

Not at all. Back then, an uneducated mob rebelled, and Lenin, with his sect, promised them all sorts of things. And Stalin came to power based on Lenin's legacy. So, I don't see any difference between these enemies of the people.
In reply to Саня Изи
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Lord Mortulus
Am I speaking like Zhirinovsky? By the way, I didn't vote for him.
Not like, but the fact that Zhirinovsky is confident that Hitler wouldn't have existed if it weren't for Stalin - to put it bluntly - is a complete lie...
Lord Mortulus
Funny. If there hadn't been a change of regime in 1916, I'm sure Russia would be the most powerful country in the world right now. And no one would be trading in timber or oil.
If there had been talented leadership, there wouldn't have been a change of regime...
WisTrit
Your conference? What did you decide? What are the plans?
We discussed it somewhere here on the forum, and probably in a similar topic... Conclusion - trolling).
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Morning
Well... m... These are certainly signs of a good state... Although some of them are not exclusive to the USSR, but... you see... maybe my views are a little bit conservative and far from ideal, but... but... but the state should provide a life full of opportunities and freedoms for every individual, right?... Or not? I think so... m... here... you see... well, and, isn't it... isn't it... does it have anything to do with queues, executions, sending people to camps, petty theft, famine, and a cult of personality?... Maybe I just don't understand something?
Back then, there were fewer freedoms - throughout history, they only increased with each decade. And then, and now - there were different ideas about "freedoms"...
In general, it does - because it's already history. You can say that it was the people who saved us, but someone at the top made decisions about what needed to be done, and what not, and how much money to allocate for it...
Lord Mortulus
Not at all. Then, an uneducated rabble rose up, to whom Lenin and his sect promised all sorts of things. And Stalin came after Lenin. So I don't see any difference between these enemies of the people.
Lenin preached Marxism, which was close to social democratic reforms and pure communism - he correctly understood that achieving universal good requires a world communist revolution. Only after his death, based on the weakness of the RSFSR, Stalin and the others decided to build developed socialism in a single country - the USSR. And from this came all the troubles, mainly...
WisTrit
Because you're a drug addict without arguments and with a schoolboy's point of view.
Wis, be quiet - you'll pass for smart)
In reply to Alex Ghost
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Strange conclusion.
But I don't need to pretend to be smart; everyone knows I'm not a skilled player in the forum game "Mafia," so I'm stupid(((
But this advice would suit you better than anyone else!
In reply to Wistrit
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
WisTrit
That's a strange conclusion.
But I don't need to pretend to be smart; everyone knows I'm not a skilled player in the forum game "Mafia," so I'm stupid(((
But this advice would suit you better than anyone else!
It's a shame you don't even learn from your mistakes...
I would gladly do it, but then you'll start whining something like, "What, did I lose, you commie?" So you naturally go where you need to go).

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb