Auto-translated
I would leave the obelisks. Removing the Grail from the game seems like a bad idea, in my opinion.
Dirty_Player
Posts from Round table
PReDS
Auto-translated
Ah, I remember a balanced game where there were 9 obelisks on my home map:D
But you're thinking about it the wrong way: "Anarchy is the mother of order!" - play it, and you'll be happy!
But you're thinking about it the wrong way: "Anarchy is the mother of order!" - play it, and you'll be happy!
Snooppy
Auto-translated
What do you mean by imbalance?
I mean that one person got a decent drop from Dragon Utopia, geared up and got stats near 30, while another only got "relics," like the same Admiral's Hat, and remained as they were... Of course, the finale will be exciting..
R55Max
Auto-translated
There is nothing to argue about and no reason to. I said my piece, you said yours, and we'll leave it at that. Only my arguments are logical; yours have no foundation.
P.S. Honestly, I don't even understand what you want? The fort? I don't give a damn about your fort. We are talking about the object.txt file.
As for the fort—that's purely my own personal IMHO, that it was banned without reason. Now we can actually finish :)
Added after 2 minutes
This is regarding the fact that one person got a decent haul from the utopia, geared up and got stats near 30, while another only got "relics," like that same Admiral's Hat, and was left with what they came with... Of course, it'll make for an exciting finale..
GoD
Auto-translated
if we're talking about SoD, then Hill Fort needs to be banned in principle... we're not playing a mirror match, so someone might get it generated, someone else might not... and excuse me, but this massively increases the tempo... on almost any template... imagine that on Jebus Cross you get this object generated for Castle (or basically for any town)... "with it, going to the center on 121 will be too late"...
I'm for removing all unnecessary things from the game... as was already mentioned. if they fixed water, even though it's more of a "core component" of the game than objects... then we need to remove everything else as well...
I'm for removing all unnecessary things from the game... as was already mentioned. if they fixed water, even though it's more of a "core component" of the game than objects... then we need to remove everything else as well...
Oelm
Auto-translated
I, for one, am in favor of allowing the hill fort, in the form it is proposed – allowing creatures to be upgraded after building the corresponding level in the castle. As for text-based maps, the attitude is strongly negative. Mapmakers and the like – this is just an expansion, obelisks, Kostyanich – this is a terrible block of 3500k – good players often don't bother with guarding the obelisks. Removing key tents and quests – not fundamentally, because smart players are welcome in the World Tree version.
Сатир
Auto-translated
I always find Oelma's tone amusing. It seems like he's not expressing his opinion in a discussion, but rather deciding what it will be, period. That's quite entertaining. :D
Where can I download these text files with detailed descriptions of the changes?
Where can I download these text files with detailed descriptions of the changes?
Oelm
Auto-translated
Satyr, in a funk, as you wish, baby.:)
Auto-translated
I've been playing with a text editor for about two years now, which removes healing forts, cartographers, and tents. I think that insisting on the presence of prohibited objects on the map is at least strange.
The situation with tents is not so clear-cut, but I still think they are inappropriate in online games on random maps, because in most cases, objects protected by guards turn out to be practically inaccessible, which distorts the intended content of the zones as defined by the map template.
The situation with tents is not so clear-cut, but I still think they are inappropriate in online games on random maps, because in most cases, objects protected by guards turn out to be practically inaccessible, which distorts the intended content of the zones as defined by the map template.
Redwhait
Auto-translated
I've been playing for about two years now with a script that removes hill forts, cartographers, and tents. I think insisting on the presence of forbidden objects on the map is at least strange.
Tents are not as clear-cut, but I still consider them inappropriate in online random maps, because in most cases objects guarded by guardians turn out to be practically inaccessible, which distorts the zone filling intended by the template.
I only remove this script on Anarchy, so all who don't like scripts, play Anarchy and you'll be happy ;)
Mizrael
Auto-translated
No kidding, guys, there's nothing else to say.
Juristis
Auto-translated
I agree with the idea of adding a hill fort. It would be great to see it in the game in this form (the ability to upgrade units if there is an upgrade building in the castle).
P.S. What a great topic! We could immediately create a list of people who use suspicious text editors.
P.S. What a great topic! We could immediately create a list of people who use suspicious text editors.
Sevensan
Auto-translated
Question (suggestion). Are there any training maps available that focus on defeating specific types of monsters? For example, you start with an initial army, and then you have to break through a prison guard. After defeating the prison, there's another hero with an army, and you have to defeat them to break through the next prison and progress further.
It could start with simple battles and then gradually increase the difficulty, serving as a tutorial for beginners. Or, it could immediately feature challenging battles for more experienced players.
Perhaps such maps already exist, but I'm not aware of them. Does anyone know how to create something like this, or where to find it? I'm looking forward to your comments.
R55Max
Auto-translated
Vikom organized a tournament to see who could achieve the highest possible conservation score with armies from week 2, using different castles. I think it's somewhat related to your question. By the way, watching the videos was very informative. Although, there weren't any moral lessons. I liked that format, even though I didn't participate, it was still interesting to watch. And I'm also curious about how to effectively defeat Nagas on the first or early second week without relying on mass spells, using a hero of level 5 and their inherent abilities, at least for some of the castles.
Auto-translated
Yes, with the morality system, there's ten times less meaning in this game.
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb