Forum — Tournament Committee

R55Max

14 years ago

Auto-translated

numOne

Ah, you'll end up in a bad situation with such an approach, and it wouldn't even be justified... And you're supposed to be an adult.

Specifically regarding this issue: The rules state that the results of GAMES count towards the seasonal ranking. No game - no discussion. Period.
Implement your ambitions, organize a tournament or two, gain some experience, and then you can start teaching us a thing or two.:smile09:

This is not a lesson. Don't misinterpret my statements.
The point is that it's the results of games, not the results of played games! For example, if a team doesn't show up for a match, they won't ask for the reason; instead, they'll register a loss and no one will be removed from the tournament table. The technical result of the game is the result of the game, and that's all there is to it. It doesn't matter for what reasons - the game will be forgotten, but the result will remain. Let's end it here.

In reply to R55Max

Pit for LM

14 years ago

Auto-translated

What's the point of arguing? As long as I'm leading the ranking, I won't include tech scores for unplayed matches in the ranking. It would be interesting, of course, to include 0-0 scores. Besides, to include a game, we need information about castles, heroes, templates, and time... This is statistics. It's much more interesting to me than points. And tech scores don't carry any meaningful weight.

In reply to Pit for LM

Тазар_Трясет_Улики

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Hey, Temich :D

To Max:
Max, I play much better than you, at least twice as good. And you're here, expressing your opinion? Do you even have a sense of morality? If you're a drunk loser, then you'll write such a report, yes. And you'll tarnish your reputation all over the forum with such actions. It's nonsense, as if the rating means something to you. If it does, then that's just noob behavior ;)
P.S. Rules exist to be broken.
P.S.S. Good luck with grinding the rating.

In reply to R55Max

RiMpel2

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Ridmi, please calm down.

In reply to Тазар_Трясет_Улики

R55Max

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Tazar_Shakes_Evidence

Hey, Temich :D

To Max:
Max, I play at least one, if not two, levels better than you. And you're here, expressing your opinion? Are you familiar with the concept of morality? If you're a drugged-out loser, then you'll write such a report, yes. And you'll disgrace yourself all over the forum with such actions. It's nonsense, as if the rating means something to you. If it does, then that's just noob behavior ;)
P.S. Rules exist to be broken.
P.S.S. Good luck with your rating grind.

I don't care how you play; I wasn't talking about skill, but about the fact that rules are meant to be followed, not broken. If you think that someone who follows the rules is a drugged-out loser, then that applies primarily to the rulemakers.
It's not about the rating or the desire to post such a "win" here. By the way, read the previous reports – there are plenty of them from different players (like, "there are no rests," or "you can't leave the city on turn 111" or "you can't leave the city on turn 112." Such a game is no better than those wins, and even worse in terms of some moral principles, because those wins are awarded and proclaimed by the rules, while turn 111 is posted by the player, although it also doesn't carry any meaningful weight, but it is still counted towards the rating) :-/

In reply to R55Max

Тазар_Трясет_Улики

14 years ago

Auto-translated

"I don't care how you play; I wasn't talking about skill." It should have started with this. If you play worse, it means you're not up to par. "Rules are meant to be followed, not broken." Within the rules, only people without imagination limit themselves. If you look at it positively, they'll tell you to jump off the roof because there's a rule for it, and you'll jump too? Oh lol, I can't. "It's not about the rating or the desire to post such a win." Then we're speaking different languages. The point is that it's about the rating when players post such wins. I don't know what you're talking about now. You're talking about something of your own, something otherworldly, and it seems like you're not even here. Hello? Anyway, I couldn't go any further; sorry, there are too many letters and incoherent sentences about some replays, players, etc.

In reply to Тазар_Трясет_Улики

R55Max

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Tazar_Shakes_Clues

"I don't care how you play, I wasn't talking about skill."

That's where you should have started. If you play worse, it means you're not in the know. :)

"Rules are meant to be followed, not broken."

Within the rules, only people without imagination limit themselves. That's if we're being reasonable. They'll tell you to jump off the roof because there's a rule for it, and you'll jump too? Oh lol, I can't :smile52:

"It's not about the rating or the desire to post such a win."

Then we're speaking different languages. The point is that it's about the rating when players post such wins. And I don't know what you're talking about now. You're talking about something of your own, something otherworldly, and it seems like you're not even here. Helloooo?
Anyway, I couldn't go any further, sorry, too many letters and incoherent sentences about some replays, players, etc.

Well, why should I try to sell you something if you don't understand what I'm talking about? :)
Incorrect comparisons. Off.

In reply to Pit for LM

PReDS

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Pit for LM

Why argue?
As long as I'm leading in the ranking, I won't count the tech points for games that haven't been played towards the ranking. It would be fun, of course, to count a 0-0 draw.
Besides, to count a game, we need information about the castles, heroes, templates, and time... This is statistics. It's much more interesting to me than the points. And the tech points don't carry any meaningful weight.

I laughed:D (10)

Pit for LM

Regarding the rejected applications. Newcomers who weren't very eager and hadn't proven themselves enough in the season or tournaments were rejected, as well as those who registered at the last moment when the groups had already been formed. The only exception was replacing Loy with Erdem, the winner of the official Novice tournament.

Regarding Preds. Complaints about this player have been accumulating since the "Favorites-2" tournament, when he withdrew after the group stage.
http://forum.heroesworld.ru/showthre...t=6247&page=43
I've also heard about situations similar to the one described by numOne.
The last straw was the events of a week ago. I have no desire to discuss them. If anyone is very curious, ask Preds.
Please don't discuss this further in the tournament thread; I will delete everything as off-topic.

In reply to PReDS

Oelm

14 years ago

Auto-translated

The rules coincide with the Rules of online games in Heroes III and the seasonal Ranking Tournament
with differences for the Balance and Panic templates, which we declare as our home templates in the HW vs HP match:

Pit, I've been wanting to ask you a question for a long time — you don't play the seasonal tournament either on HW or HP, and I haven't seen you in the tournaments for quite a while. However, your nickname pops up quite often on GR. Is this change in mood related to any objective factors?

KobRa_RR

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Vellington disqualified for six matches. Head of the Disciplinary Committee, Vladimir Katkov, commented on the Disciplinary Committee's decision regarding Spartak's striker, Vellington. The Brazilian striker was disqualified for six matches for rough play against CSKA goalkeeper Igor Akinfeev. "Today, at the meeting of the RFU Executive Committee, the situation with Vellington was discussed, and the entire RFU Disciplinary Committee was invited. The Executive Committee, in accordance with Article 127 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations, provided an interpretation of Article 94 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations. After that, a meeting of the Disciplinary Committee was held to impose sanctions on Vellington. Based on paragraph 4 of Article 94, for rough play that resulted in an injury to an opponent, Vellington was disqualified for 6 matches," the RFU official website quotes Katkov as saying. Meat comments: "The horses and the bums bought everything" )))) And of course, they forgot how they bought the matches themselves!!!))))

In reply to KobRa_RR

R55Max

14 years ago

Auto-translated

KobRa_RR

Welliton disqualified for six matches

The head of the Disciplinary Committee, Vladimir Katkov, commented on the Disciplinary Committee's decision regarding Spartak striker Welliton. The Brazilian striker was disqualified for six matches for rough play against CSKA goalkeeper Igor Akinfeev.

- Today, at the meeting of the RFU Executive Committee, the situation with Welliton was discussed, and the entire RFU Disciplinary Committee was invited. The Executive Committee, in accordance with Art. 127 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations, provided an interpretation of Art. 94 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations. After that, a meeting of the Disciplinary Committee was held to impose sanctions on Welliton. Based on paragraph 4 of Art. 94, for rough play that caused injury to an opponent, Welliton was disqualified for 6 matches, - the official website of the RFU quotes Katkov.

Meat comments: "The horses and the bums bought everything" ))))
And they naturally forgot how they bought the matches themselves!!!))))

Yes, of course, Igor is needed, but despite Welliton's guilt, there was no intentional play to inflict injury!

By the way, where did Guberniev disappear to? It seems that an analysis is underway. Ozerov also had a similar incident))

Added after 4 hours 2 minutes
The Lokomotiv hockey team perished in a plane crash! I express my condolences to all the people for whom the lives of these brave guys are important! This accident is enormous in its scale, but this loss is irreplaceable and extremely regrettable. To all the people of YAROSLAVL, FANS, and PARENTS, MY CONDOLENCES!

In reply to KobRa_RR

Redwhait

14 years ago

Auto-translated

KobRa_RR

Welliton disqualified for six matches

The head of the Disciplinary Committee, Vladimir Katkov, commented on the Disciplinary Committee's decision regarding Spartak's striker, Welliton. The Brazilian striker was disqualified for six matches for rough play against CSKA goalkeeper Igor Akinfeev.

"Today, at the meeting of the RFU Executive Committee, the situation with Welliton was discussed, and the entire RFU Disciplinary Committee was invited. The Executive Committee, in accordance with Article 127 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations, provided an interpretation of Article 94 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations. After that, a meeting of the Disciplinary Committee was held to impose sanctions on Welliton. Based on paragraph 4 of Article 94, for rough play that resulted in an injury to an opponent, Welliton was disqualified for 6 matches," the official RFU website quotes Katkov as saying.

Meat comments: "The 'horses' and 'homeless' bought everything" ))))
And they conveniently forgot how they themselves bought the matches!))))

Where is the confirmation of even one fixed match?
If there isn't any, then there's no need to write such nonsense, especially since you yourself remember how the 'horses' and your team were helped to win their last championships.
And the fact that the 'horses', Zenit, and Dynamo can only play such behind-the-scenes games is no longer news to anyone. It seems that all the management in Russian football is corrupt, starting with Fursenko and ending with the lawyer

In reply to Redwhait

KobRa_RR

14 years ago

Auto-translated

So, Lukoil didn't allocate enough funds for winning the championship? Apparently, someone embezzled some money, because they only have enough to consistently come in second place :D :D

YummiGummi

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Sevan_80

There are restrictions for this:
5.8. Restrictions on castles.
5.8.1. In the Conflux castle, it is forbidden to upgrade monsters of levels 1, 6, and 7.
When playing as Conflux, the starting hero is chosen randomly when the map is generated.
5.8.2. In the Necropolis castle, it is forbidden to build a necromancy enhancer.
When playing as Necropolis, it is forbidden to choose Galtran as the starting hero. If Galtran arrives as a non-starting hero, you CAN develop him, and for any castle.

Friend, the very fact of allowing necromancy is incomparable to any restrictions))) This is not like releasing skeletons, as in Fortress :D