Posts from Forum

Ah, you'll end up in a bad situation with such an approach, and it wouldn't even be justified... And you're supposed to be an adult.

Specifically regarding this issue: The rules state that the results of GAMES count towards the seasonal ranking. No game - no discussion. Period.
Implement your ambitions, organize a tournament or two, gain some experience, and then you can start teaching us a thing or two.:smile09:

Hey, Temich :D

To Max:
Max, I play at least one, if not two, levels better than you. And you're here, expressing your opinion? Are you familiar with the concept of morality? If you're a drugged-out loser, then you'll write such a report, yes. And you'll disgrace yourself all over the forum with such actions. It's nonsense, as if the rating means something to you. If it does, then that's just noob behavior ;)
P.S. Rules exist to be broken.
P.S.S. Good luck with your rating grind.

"I don't care how you play, I wasn't talking about skill."

That's where you should have started. If you play worse, it means you're not in the know. :)

"Rules are meant to be followed, not broken."

Within the rules, only people without imagination limit themselves. That's if we're being reasonable. They'll tell you to jump off the roof because there's a rule for it, and you'll jump too? Oh lol, I can't :smile52:

"It's not about the rating or the desire to post such a win."

Then we're speaking different languages. The point is that it's about the rating when players post such wins. And I don't know what you're talking about now. You're talking about something of your own, something otherworldly, and it seems like you're not even here. Helloooo?
Anyway, I couldn't go any further, sorry, too many letters and incoherent sentences about some replays, players, etc.

Why argue?
As long as I'm leading in the ranking, I won't count the tech points for games that haven't been played towards the ranking. It would be fun, of course, to count a 0-0 draw.
Besides, to count a game, we need information about the castles, heroes, templates, and time... This is statistics. It's much more interesting to me than the points. And the tech points don't carry any meaningful weight.

Regarding the rejected applications. Newcomers who weren't very eager and hadn't proven themselves enough in the season or tournaments were rejected, as well as those who registered at the last moment when the groups had already been formed. The only exception was replacing Loy with Erdem, the winner of the official Novice tournament.

Regarding Preds. Complaints about this player have been accumulating since the "Favorites-2" tournament, when he withdrew after the group stage.
http://forum.heroesworld.ru/showthre...t=6247&page=43
I've also heard about situations similar to the one described by numOne.
The last straw was the events of a week ago. I have no desire to discuss them. If anyone is very curious, ask Preds.
Please don't discuss this further in the tournament thread; I will delete everything as off-topic.

The rules coincide with the Rules of online games in Heroes III and the seasonal Ranking Tournament
with differences for the Balance and Panic templates, which we declare as our home templates in the HW vs HP match:

Welliton disqualified for six matches

The head of the Disciplinary Committee, Vladimir Katkov, commented on the Disciplinary Committee's decision regarding Spartak striker Welliton. The Brazilian striker was disqualified for six matches for rough play against CSKA goalkeeper Igor Akinfeev.

- Today, at the meeting of the RFU Executive Committee, the situation with Welliton was discussed, and the entire RFU Disciplinary Committee was invited. The Executive Committee, in accordance with Art. 127 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations, provided an interpretation of Art. 94 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations. After that, a meeting of the Disciplinary Committee was held to impose sanctions on Welliton. Based on paragraph 4 of Art. 94, for rough play that caused injury to an opponent, Welliton was disqualified for 6 matches, - the official website of the RFU quotes Katkov.

Meat comments: "The horses and the bums bought everything" ))))
And they naturally forgot how they bought the matches themselves!!!))))

Welliton disqualified for six matches

The head of the Disciplinary Committee, Vladimir Katkov, commented on the Disciplinary Committee's decision regarding Spartak's striker, Welliton. The Brazilian striker was disqualified for six matches for rough play against CSKA goalkeeper Igor Akinfeev.

"Today, at the meeting of the RFU Executive Committee, the situation with Welliton was discussed, and the entire RFU Disciplinary Committee was invited. The Executive Committee, in accordance with Article 127 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations, provided an interpretation of Article 94 of the RFU Disciplinary Regulations. After that, a meeting of the Disciplinary Committee was held to impose sanctions on Welliton. Based on paragraph 4 of Article 94, for rough play that resulted in an injury to an opponent, Welliton was disqualified for 6 matches," the official RFU website quotes Katkov as saying.

Meat comments: "The 'horses' and 'homeless' bought everything" ))))
And they conveniently forgot how they themselves bought the matches!))))

There are restrictions for this:
5.8. Restrictions on castles.
5.8.1. In the Conflux castle, it is forbidden to upgrade monsters of levels 1, 6, and 7.
When playing as Conflux, the starting hero is chosen randomly when the map is generated.
5.8.2. In the Necropolis castle, it is forbidden to build a necromancy enhancer.
When playing as Necropolis, it is forbidden to choose Galtran as the starting hero. If Galtran arrives as a non-starting hero, you CAN develop him, and for any castle.

Sure, but... what's the approximate win rate? Do you have any data?