Posts from Mafia 29. Witch Hunt

Hmm, yes, indeed... "Nothing is lost" - that's amusing. But who do you think Aves is then? Is it a hint at the absence of a non-damage skill, and she's a Prior?

And yes, I understand that, as a Templar, you will urge people to protect your mafia, but we can think for ourselves and understand that you are also our opponents. If one of the mafias does kill the Inquisitor, we will be in a bad situation against you, considering the possibility of resurrection.

It's logical, you ask her to resurrect someone, and yet you expect her to kill you? So, what's the point of resurrecting them then? It doesn't make sense. :).\nAnd in general, the Executioner is very beneficial for the Demon Worshippers. :)

Added 4 minutes later

An Adept? Why an Adept? The Adept is Gur; the clue from "La Commedia" pointed to him, and to me. According to your arguments, I'm a Magister, so the clue refers to him. And the murder of the Hermit is a sacrifice; the inscription carved on his forehead... Isn't that a sacrifice? And on the Adept's card, there are claws digging in, which leave similar scratches, like on the Hermit's forehead. What's wrong with the Adept?

I think that the absence of a non-combat skill that a Rogue can use is equivalent to it not existing at all.

Sorry, Gil, but why "we"? So far, I only see your opinion on this. :)

Hmm, that was sarcasm. I hope you too. :D
It's beneficial, but you should tell them that, not me. :)
Well, who else could it be, if not the Prophet or the Adept? The Antichrist? And about the clue – I wasn't entirely sure I had found all possible interpretations. Over time, this certainty didn't appear either. You did a great job. You even corrected me about the fact that the Prophet couldn't be killed by the Hunter (due to his status). The Adept, in your opinion, is Gur. The Antichrist also cannot be killed due to his status. And who is Ar then? The Inquisitor? :D This is already too obvious a search for a player who can be blamed instead.

I would gladly execute Aves; I'm so tired of arguing with her. And Kitz Kitsunka is a Marshal; it's obvious.
Should we keep TaKo? I REALLY DON'T KNOW.

An Inquisitor with an inverted cross? Hmm... Actually, I thought that if Arandor isn't the Antichrist, the Prophet, or an Adept, then it's quite possible that he's a Sorcerer, and in that case, the cross is perfectly explainable as the best student of a necromancer.

Where is the "almost" then, if it's completely?

Well, that's a rather weak argument, please don't take it personally :)
Instead, tell me why Arandor couldn't be a Sorcerer?

Added 1 minute ago
And why aren't you commenting on the evidence related to Gur? :(

Added 2 minutes ago
Regarding Reg - "The pentagram has long been used as a symbol protecting against evil."
For a long time, the pentagram was a symbol of health and life. It was believed to be able to protect against evil spirits, evil spells, and witchcraft. The pentagon (a regular pentagon) is a symbol of perfection and eternity, a powerful amulet of health, and a magical tool in magic rituals. In the Middle Ages, it was often seen at the entrance to a house as protection against the devil and evil spirits.
Again, it's not a fact that Reg is an occultist.

No, you should rather explain why he COULD be a Sorceress. :D Since when do Sorceresses walk around with books that have inverted crosses on them?

I commented on the clue back then, and it doesn't seem accurate enough to me. But I admit you might be right. That's why I'm sending the Thief to the Guru.

And who do you think Reg is, and what does this have to do with the Pentagram?

I didn't quite understand... was the Blacksmith's block successful or not?
Blacksmith. Special ability – Heavy Hand. Blocks a selected player. (Exception – Warlock, Templar, Grand Inquisitor, Witch Hunter)
If the block was successful: among the peaceful roles, the Thief is present. The Usurer bribed her on the first night, and the Inquisitor checked her on the second... meaning there is only one peaceful role.
If it was unsuccessful: it's either the Templar or the Witch Hunter.

The Witch Hunter kills a player with the "cursed" status. So, if the Witch Hunter comes for the soul of the player in question, even if she is a Templar, he won't kill her. But if she is the Thief, he might. However, based on the note, if it's truthful, the player in question is a Heretic, which means she can't be classified as any of the peaceful roles. Let's hope the note is genuine?

So, what should I say? Aren't you the one denying my conclusion? Then please, tell me where I'm wrong. :)
And why do you think it's not accurate enough?

You are so stubborn. You deny the general opinion that Ar is the Adept. So, go ahead and prove it; I'll gladly read your arguments. :)