Skip to content

Posts from Heroes 6 - Discussion Auto-translated

4.3 (15 ratings)
#3711
Auto-translated
If there's no local multiplayer, then you can't even play on a single PC, which is :smile18:
You go to the countryside, or on vacation, or you just need to kill 8-10 hours and you don't have internet access, and how many people won't be able to play simply because they don't have internet!
And I would say that Ubisoft's policy isn't great; I even think they're counting on some degree of failure with the 6th installment, but on success with the expansions. They're focusing on the European and post-Soviet audience. And they introduced 2 new races: South American Papuans and Naga-Asians, and the Naga are a trump card that will be enjoyable for anyone to play.
Well, if the budget doesn't pay off, then dragons, elves, and dwarves come into play – the heavy artillery of the Heroes series. And it seems they're focusing on uniting fans of Heroes 3 and Heroes 5. In short, the guys decided to make a killing.
User Avatar
#3712
Auto-translated
Hmm, please excuse me, but where did the idea that Heroes 6 might fail even come from? So far, everything seemed to be going well: the factions, the world, the atmosphere (I think it will remain), and suddenly I see posts about the possible failure of this game *astonished*.
Самая тёмная ночь перед рассветом...
User Avatar
#3713
Auto-translated
Probably, people say that because there is still not enough information, especially about the battles and the strategic map. We don't know how the damage will be calculated, what objects will be on the strategic map, and they haven't officially announced the fifth faction yet... In my opinion, this won't prevent fans from buying the game, but, as you can see, others think differently.
70 UAH
Not really. Three years ago, you could buy a good game for 70 UAH. Now, prices range from 130-170 UAH. Considering that this is a well-known game, with a large print run, and a lot of money was invested in it. In my opinion, "Heroes 6" is already being considered as one of these games.
Карты для Heroes of Might and Magic V
Цикл "Закадычные враги": "Особенное гостеприимство, "Супероружие", "Меж молотом и наковальней"
"Падение Шантири"

Кампания для "Кодекса Войны"
"Выбор Сагиттеля"
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#3714
Auto-translated
Morning
Having an account with numbers; rooms that can accommodate two and a half hundred people at once; sections for different games; various perks like access to broadcasts, et cetera, et cetera. In general, it's a somewhat garish but quite developed client. People use Hamachi and similar programs if they don't know about Garena, or if they organize cozy matches with well-known friends and some beer.
I've never used Garena, but I have used OpenVPN, which also has rooms for different games and various perks, but with a garish design. In any case, the purpose of all these programs is the same.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.

God save us everyone
Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
User Avatar
#3715
Auto-translated
Ple-sen, morning, I absolutely don't care about your "anti" troll posts, which are real trolling. Where is the moderator?

Added 3 minutes ago
No matter how it seems. Three years ago, you could buy a good game for 70 UAH. Now, prices range from 130-170 UAH. Provided that it's a popular game, with a large print run, and a lot of money was invested in it. In my opinion, "Heroes 6" is already considered one of these games.
I was recently in a store; the average game costs 90 UAH, and only more expensive if it's a collection of games, "gold editions," etc.

Added 5 minutes ago
MararV
Hmm, excuse me, but where did the idea of "Heroes 6" failing come from? So far, everything seemed good: the factions, the world, the atmosphere (I think it will remain). And suddenly, I see posts about the possible failure of this game *shocked*.
The difference in atmosphere between the third and fifth games is huge; between the fifth and sixth, it's much smaller, but still noticeable and understandable. The orcs have been completely changed, although it's justified, but this style doesn't suit the great, free orcs. The demons are more like something else, the Necropolis are Egyptians-spiders, the Naga are a mix of cultures from distant Asia. Only the humans are somewhat stable. Where do you see the preservation of the atmosphere, good factions? There are, of course, successful moments, but most... Of course, originality is good, but then it's already a different game. I want a normal fantasy turn-based strategy, with green orcs, noble humans, elegant vampire-necropolis, tempting demons, and so on. In general, I agree with the originality of the sixth game, but only on the condition that they make a normal classic game in the future. With a normal style, units, and everything else mentioned above.
А что я здесь делаю то?
#3716
Auto-translated
Hmm, excuse me, but where did the idea of the 6th installment failing come from? So far, everything seemed fine: the races, the world, the atmosphere (I think it will remain), and suddenly I see posts about the possible failure of this game *astonished*.
My advice is to listen to fewer old-timers. They are always dissatisfied with new games.
The difference in atmosphere between the third and fifth games is huge; between the fifth and sixth, it's much smaller, but it's still noticeable and understandable. The orcs have been completely restyled, although it's justified, but this style doesn't suit the great, free orcs. The demons are more like something else, not demons; the Necropolis are like Egyptians and spiders; the Naga are a mix of cultures from distant Asia. Only the humans are somewhat stable. Where do you see the preservation of the atmosphere and good races here? There are, of course, some successful elements, but most...
I see good races here. These are all the races.
Of course, originality and uniqueness are good, but then it's already a different game. I want a normal fantasy turn-based strategy, with green orcs, noble humans, elegant vampire-necropolis, tempting demons, and so on. In general, I agree with the originality of the sixth installment, but only on the condition that they make a normal classic game in the future. With a normal style, units, and everything else mentioned above.
You are a typical conservative, that is, an old-timer. MararV, listen to fewer people like that so you don't spoil your impression of the game.
User Avatar
#3717
Auto-translated
The races, their style, and other aspects are irrelevant here. The point is that times have changed; there's a prevalence of various consoles, or shooters and real-time strategies if we're talking about PC games. Back then, computers were much less powerful, and turn-based games were popular. Now, it seems to me that the core gamer base has significantly decreased; new players are essentially unfamiliar with the concept of a "turn-based strategy," and the old ones have grown up and are busy with work and family matters. And so, Ubisoft is releasing a new turn-based game but isn't putting much effort into promoting it everywhere, which makes me worry that the game won't be purchased as actively as Ubisoft would like. At least, that's how it seems to me.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.

God save us everyone
Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
User Avatar
#3718
Auto-translated
You're a typical conservative, meaning you're an old-timer.
Imagine, I haven't played the third game. Almost.
А что я здесь делаю то?
User Avatar
#3719
Auto-translated
I wonder, what does the third game have to do with it.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#3722
Auto-translated
I don't understand whiners at all, those who complain about everything: "back in our day, the trees were taller, the trolls were greener, the elves had pointier ears, and the strategies were more turn-based." Americans call such people "never happy."
What I see in the screenshots, I personally like. And the developers are behaving very smartly, releasing information in small doses to keep interest in the game high. And those who like to whine and complain will always find a reason.
User Avatar
#3723
Auto-translated
Did you see the cover?
And those who think that Heroes 6 was a failure, read this.
Фанатское руководствo по Героям VI (spamm, alexrom66, Павлов и Magic Art): Английская (v.0.93) и Русская (v.0.93.1) версии
Арт-бук вы можете взять здесь
へ へ
の の
 も
 へ
In reply to Werevolka
User Avatar
#3724
Auto-translated
GamaUn
I don't understand whiners who complain about everything: "back in our day, the trees were taller, the trolls were greener, the elves had bigger ears, and the strategies were more turn-based." Americans call these people "never happy."
What I see in the screenshots, I personally like. And the developers are behaving very smartly, releasing information in small doses to keep interest in the game alive. And those who like to whine and complain will always find a reason.
The developers are behaving very smartly in the sense that they manage to present old or obvious things as something new, without needing any special explanations. The screenshots are certainly beautiful, but they've become stale. In my opinion, player interest is simply slowly fading rather than being stoked, especially since there isn't much time left until the release.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.

God save us everyone
Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
#3725
Auto-translated
People seem to age early these days... Back in my time, it was completely different...
I agree...
Imagine, I haven't played the third game. Almost.
What were you playing, that you're criticizing the unreleased 6th game?