Posts from Club championship of the CIS countries.
I won't be able to attend the tournament he's organizing.
Calm down :)
I am calm :)
Sanya is an excellent organizer; I saw it myself in real life. It's just his communication style on the forum.
I don't think it's worth making such comparisons without knowing the person personally.
After that, I simply stopped seeing him as a person, and I won't be able to go to the tournament he organizes.
A great organizer is someone who only handles the organizational duties assigned to him (it's unclear by whom). Reception, accommodation, club rental, meals, entertainment. That's it. They give him a list of participants, and he's responsible for providing the above. The rules, and especially the composition of the participants, are none of his business.
You know, I communicate a lot in forums, on ICQ, and I've met some people in person. I can say with absolute certainty that, in very few (or perhaps none) cases, my opinion after meeting them in real life differed from the opinion I had formed virtually. Moreover, a person can smile at you in person, but when your face is not visible, or rather, when they hide their face behind a computer monitor, then, strangely enough, their true self emerges. Think about it yourself. ;)
You won't be going to a tournament that he organizes, but rather to socialize with good people, with whom you've been communicating virtually for so long. Maybe that makes a difference?
I believe that if, because of the organizer's personality, even one of the participants refuses to go, then that organizer should be disregarded. And here, more than one person is refusing to go solely because of Navukh.
I believe that if even one participant refuses to come because of the organizer's personality, then that organizer should be dismissed. And here, more than one person is refusing to come just because of Navukh.
It feels like an overly sensitive approach. We're talking about the final of the CIS region. This is probably the most significant sporting event in recent times. Maybe we can put aside grievances? At worst, there will be a chance to settle things in person, not behind a monitor.
Where are the grievances? This person is really ruining the final with their statements, or am I the only one who sees it? But it seems that because of them, several people have already refused to participate. Maybe it would be better to find a more adequate organizer? Would you be interested?
I hate conflicts, but when facts are distorted, it gets on my nerves. Cap writes that he sent me a message in response to me immediately starting to swear at him... I'm attaching the complete log of that conversation, uncensored and with explanations. I knew that there were no qualifying spots for the finals from fourth place, so I didn't even think about going to Kyiv, especially after Predds and Stinger didn't make it through the qualifiers in Moscow. However, a series of rejections followed, and everything became completely unclear (which, by the way, Peterius rightly pointed out - who knows what criteria and who is selecting the finalists). Then I asked in this thread to clearly announce who is going (I saw the Excel file, but it didn't provide any clarity). Then Captain showed up and asked if I could go "if necessary." I can't stand uncertainty, especially in such matters (it's better to book tickets in advance, plan time, and find funds for the trip). When I expressed my confusion about the fact that the lineup was unclear (where exactly did I swear at him?), I received a harsh response... After that, I simply stopped seeing him as a person, and I will no longer be able to go to the tournament that he organizes.
Gentlemen, this looks like a simple misunderstanding. Two hot-headed guys didn't understand each other. I'm sure that both you and you, Mikhail, have had to listen to much more unpleasant things. Rise above these misunderstandings; why waste the opportunity to play in the finals on another argument? You probably should have replied that it's still unclear who decides on the participants, and that you took ambiguous phrases too personally. If possible, you should definitely go; all of this is nonsense. Imagine that you talked to ATG:) . You talked and forgot, and any negativity is just a shell that you need to get rid of as quickly as possible.
icq: 407907277
skype: piterius_i
Yes, Eddie received a humanitarian restart from me due to a loss. The fourth point was given to him because it no longer mattered.
P.S. I'm not yelling, I'm just stating facts.
I'm also not yelling, I'm just informing the judges ;)
however, the latter clearly lack experience in similar situations :(
in a game against me, Eddie lost on the 1st week, and the guild also shows a comparable army strength between us :eek:
nevertheless, my opponent claimed on this forum about my loss and his victory :eek: :eek: and refused to replay the controversial postponed game, using precisely these motives! it's interesting why? after the replay began, Preds found full control using the shortest route, although from the viewers' perspective, everything was logical – he ran, he found it, but didn't take the Sphere of Air next to the village, which had 5 movement points left (and received a Chupacabra in 2 turns))) and then, with 100 mana and resurrection, he didn't go into the Utopia with magic relics, but simply teleported home to 146, when there was no growth at all – well, things happen!.....
draw your own conclusions, but the fact that he lied on this forum about our game (but okay, he didn't lie, but intentionally presented only part of the facts, drawing a clearly distorted picture) is obvious to me personally
but no decisions were made by the judges regarding this game – it's not a big deal
judges' mistakes sometimes affect even football, the main thing is the unintentionality of these mistakes....
(с) Roger Zelazny
but no decisions were made by the judges regarding this match – it’s not a big deal.
Judicial errors sometimes affect football as well; the main thing is that these errors are unintentional.
Moreover, I didn’t immediately accept the refusal, but continued to persuade you to finish the match for some time. And only after I realized that your decision was final, I awarded Eddie a technical victory.
The only complaint here could be that I missed the moment when Eddie left the club instead of playing this match. But this is already an organizational issue, not a judging one.
The decision was made – I suggested finishing the game. You refused.
Moreover, I didn't immediately accept the refusal, but continued to persuade you to finish the game for some time. And only after I realized that your decision was final, I awarded Eddie a technical victory.
The only complaint could be that I missed the moment when Eddie left the club instead of playing this game. But that's more of an organizational issue, not a judging one.
Well, the fate of Предса didn't appeal to me, especially with such confidence from my opponent in his strategy))
And Eddie did leave the club, but not entirely; we left together, but when it was time to finish the game, he managed to be absent, quite a display of discipline!..
But I'm talking about the earlier decision, in the club itself – when the problem was identified – and not here on the forum afterwards :)
(с) Roger Zelazny
Where are the grievances?
Is this person really ruining the entire final with their statements, or am I the only one who sees it? But it seems to me that because of him, several people have already refused to come. Maybe it would be better to find a more adequate organizer? Would you be interested?
The conversations are pointless, I suggest we stop, and everyone should focus on what they have undertaken. Vik wrote everything clearly, who is coming from Michurinsk, who is coming from Moscow. An agreement has been reached with the Captain for the club. We have sorted out the versions, and the templates as well. Everything related to the tasks is working, and that's the main thing, and what people say is secondary.
We've sorted out the versions, and the templates as well.
Sorry for interrupting. But I'd like to offer a small recommendation: for TE and TE-Lite, you should immediately specify the official settings so that there aren't disputes later about which boxes to check... For the Lite version, I suggest that it be closer to TE than to SOD, since the TE players won the vote. My suggestion: all TE settings are used, except for the bank, tax, unit experience, classes, and spell shuffling (although I understand that it's more balanced with spells in the full version...). In general, there should definitely be no slow roads, with the 2nd level building constructed, chess clocks (what is the official control time, by the way?), 3 stacks for everyone, and IMO, no morale or group stacks. This is my humble opinion; if anyone disagrees, please express your own (especially the finalists).
Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51:
Sorry for butting in. But I'd like to give a small recommendation: for TE, TE-Lite, the official settings should be specified right away, so that later there are no arguments over which checkboxes to tick instead of actually playing...
1) Bans on sea artifacts and spells (cap of levitation, pendant of levitation, boots of levitation, water walking, summon/destroy boat)
2) Wild monsters (neutrals do not join, neither for free nor for gold) - diplomacy can be learned and used.
3) Restricted DD (1 Dimension Door in all cases) - as in HeroesWorld rules
4) Disable some town building (ban on amplifier and upgrades of level 1-6-7 dwellings in Conflux) - as in HeroesWorld rules
5) Patch for one-way portals (they work as two-way portals) - relevant for XL+U templates.
6) Chess clocks - 4000+400
Roads will apparently be average on all templates (still being discussed).
That seems to be it. As for building a second dwelling and other optional features, let the players agree among themselves; by default, they are disabled.