Auto-translated
Well, I think everyone who wanted to express their opinion on this topic has already voted. The majority is in favor, so it's time to implement it.
bRitvo4kA
Posts from Amendment to section 5.2.1 of the Hv rules (regarding quick-cast spells).
Open
Should point 5.2.1 be removed from the rules?
49
voters
Single choice
Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
bRitvo4kA
Wlk777
Auto-translated
Well, I think everyone who wanted to express their opinion on this topic has already voted. The majority is in favor, so it's time to implement it.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
I think this will add new interest and intrigue. I'm in favor again.
The only intrigue will be whether your opponent will kill you with a teapot on turn 117-121 or not, and whether you'll manage to escape to the treasure room...
To remove any doubt about who will win, let's also allow players to choose Solmyr as their starting hero: :smile01:
Wlk777
Auto-translated
The only intrigue will be whether your opponent will kill you with a teapot on turn 117-121, or they won't make it and you'll manage to escape to the treasury...
To remove any doubt that they will kill you, let's allow players to choose Solmyr as a starting hero:smile01:
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
If contacting units on 117-121 was that easy... the game would be primitive... And who prevents you from taking Thorgrim, for example? There are many counter-strategies... And regarding Solmyr... He has many drawbacks. By week 3-4, he will most likely become useless... Do you have any objections?
Is this some kind of joke? Where does it say you'll even make it to week 3-4? ;)
There are certainly strategies: Thorgrim, tactics + mass haste, cloak or amulet, antichain. But I still doubt that Solmyr won't be overpowered in the long run. And Dymir with Jeddite + Tant are heroes of the same caliber... Tant is 100% overpowered.
Wlk777
Auto-translated
Tant is definitely overpowered.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
I think people will simply start playing as Tower more often because of Solmyr. But I don't think anyone will replace Shakti/Galtran with these resurrection units.
Wlk777
Auto-translated
I think people will simply start playing Fortress more often because of Solmyr. But I don't think anyone will replace Shakti/Galtran with these resurrection heroes.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
Alex_R
Auto-translated
I think people will simply start playing Tower more often because of Solmyr. But I don't think anyone will replace Shakti/Galtran with these ressurrectors.
Even if Solmyr or Tant are a little overpowered, they will still be in line with already recognized overpowered heroes like Gosh, Shak, Kirya, etc.
But I repeat, to add variety to the game, and even in Dungeon, I suggest starting with a random hero for all castles, and then Dungeon won't be valued higher than most castles.
And for Tower, it's not really important who the starting hero is - so it will only benefit from this.
Castle will be slightly less popular, but there won't be that worn-out Valeska in every report.
Believe me, the overall balance affects things much more than these minor details like one player getting Kirya as a starting hero, and another getting Ufretin.
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
I propose a match, let's say, to 3 wins – to anyone who supports these innovations. I'll start with red Solmyr or blue Tant. And you play, adhering to point 5.2.1, with any faction. I, in turn, will try to win solely through hero specialization. Thus, the winner will prove that they are right.
Two conditions:
1). Slow roads – restart.
2). My opponent cannot choose Togrim as the starting hero against my tower.
Let the restart timer remain at 116; earlier, no one will agree anyway.
Two conditions:
1). Slow roads – restart.
2). My opponent cannot choose Togrim as the starting hero against my tower.
Let the restart timer remain at 116; earlier, no one will agree anyway.
Javdet
Auto-translated
It seems like the discussion isn't going anywhere. A vote with double weighting (and if you consider the Techies as well, it's triple!) – maybe it's time to make some changes?
And about something that's been bothering me: the other day, I played an important game on the portal – I decided to fight a strong opponent with Solmyr, even though I could have easily just leveled up Moner. But my unconventional actions led to a red orb... mages are already at a disadvantage due to the random element, and with this artifact, it's even worse. There's a good artifact – the Amulet of Sacrifice, if you're playing against a mage, and I suggest banning the orb. It's not because I lost – it's just that the game (with the random element) boils down to a standard start with a warrior... I would like to see a little more variety...
Даже если вас съели - у вас два выхода:smile19:
Зима 2011-12.
Зима 2011-12.
bRitvo4kA
Auto-translated
I suggest a match, let's say, to 3 wins – to anyone who supports these innovations. I'll start with red Solmyr or blue Tantum. And you play, adhering to point 5.2.1, with any race. I, in turn, will try to win solely through hero specialization. The winner will thus prove that they are right.
Two conditions:
1) Slow roads – restart.
2) My opponent cannot choose Togrim as a starting hero against my tower.
Let the restart timer remain at 116; no one will agree to anything earlier anyway.
Alex_R
Auto-translated
Are you playing while adhering to section 5.2.1, regardless of the chosen faction?
I try to win solely through the hero's specialization.
Two conditions...
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
Okay, if the two small conditions bothered you, let's do it without them. :) It seems like some people just want to argue... :cool:
286-406-830. I'm waiting for brave players.
286-406-830. I'm waiting for brave players.
bRitvo4kA
Auto-translated
You are a strong player, and if you challenge a beginner now and win, you won't prove anything to anyone. Make such offers to players of your level.