Posts from On-line rating (discussion)

Personally, my opinion is:
1. The rating would be better calculated based on tournaments (if the organizer announces that it's a ranked tournament).

Simply calculating the online rating based on any online games means that a newcomer will NEVER be able to catch up to the leader. Let me explain: in a tournament, if you lose, you're out, you wait for the next one. But you can play as much as you want, even though not everyone can play as much as they want. Therefore, the person with more free time will have more chances to get into the top 10 or top 5.

Sincerely.

Not everyone can participate in tournaments (for various reasons), hence the discrimination (perhaps a bit of an exaggeration). Let those who want to participate in this ranking, and not just those who were lucky enough to get into a tournament (those who can).

You are the organizer, so it's up to you:)
But my position is as follows:
Rating is for ranked tournaments:)

You are the organizer, so it's up to you:)
But my position is as follows:
Rating is for ranked tournaments:)

Best regards

Okay, if you don't like this rating, then don't use it. If you need one for Tournaments, create your own if you can!

I took a look.
Why isn't the rating being tracked?
If there are any problems with that, let me know, I'm interested.
Regarding the layout: well, if there are 200 players, it takes a long time to scroll through the statistics (not criticizing, just pointing it out).
Otherwise, it's fine.

2. Map settings options: Players – 2; Computers – 0; Teams – 0; Map size L+U; Templates – by agreement, but I recommend 2sm4d(3) – for this, you need to download the file attached at the end of this post and extract it to the "Data" folder; no water; strong monsters; difficulty 160%; time limit per turn – 4 minutes.

It is allowed to transfer spells of banned heroes through the "training" skill, but this spell can only be used after building the corresponding level of the Mage Guild.

7. The attacking hero is not allowed to retreat in the first round of battle if he has used combat magic. This restriction does not apply to the hero who is defending.

I prefer this city selection scheme:

but I think it's impossible to track.

And what is this nonsense! Why not? I have nothing against it, but I want an explanation.

This is to prevent situations like this: a player attacks another, uses magic, and then pays them off. Then they attack again, use magic, and pay them off. I think the explanation is clear.

The rules state that you should agree individually with each player.
With your scheme, only Ramparts, Dungeons, and Castles will be played. The proposed scheme has proven itself on many resources.

This is to prevent the following situation: when a player attacks another, hits with magic, and then pays them off. Then they attack again, hit with magic, and pay them off. I think the explanation is clear.

Everything is tracked very easily by the save files.

Any changes to the rules are allowed with the mutual consent of the players, except for item 14. That is, you can play according to mutually agreed-upon rules and even without any rules at all (again, item 14 applies under all circumstances),

After all, if you don't like playing as Necropolis, why play as it???

Mmmm, but why is there such unfairness regarding the hit-and-run tactic??? It's a perfectly established tactic. Some build their entire game around it. It's some kind of restriction of the game's possibilities.

And if I attack with 7 silver pegasi, one by one, cast a spell, and run away at the beginning of the second round - is this trick allowed, and how is it "more fair" than the one described above?

And how will you track the use of regeneration, chain lightning, or shower using save files???

Similar to the previous answer. What tactic should be used to kill all the Barbarian troops with a single Pegasus because they have no creatures, and the Pegasus can do it faster?