Posts from Mafia 111. Buruaka

Yeah, the Battle of Waterloo was definitely the first defeat of the "Gurglethroat" coalition (of 6 members) by Napoleon's empire. And the phrase "169 days since the first defeat" definitely means "169 days from the beginning of the year."

In short, as I understand it, they're blaming me for the entire game because of "inactive play," completely forgetting that I'm playing based on information from newspapers, of which there is practically nothing here.

P.S. Medj, will you give me another "epic fail" and "fail" after the game? I understand. No more Revneys, Mentors, or Arandors... Go ahead and indulge in your ontology...

Added 8 minutes later
How am I supposed to answer your question? The only one who can somehow hint at their role using information from newspapers is the blocker, which I am not, for obvious reasons.

Guaranteed, according to olology.

P.S. Medge, after the game, will you give me "epic fail" and "unsatisfactory" again?

Maniac - Aretz or Nebok.

Master, in your opinion, who would be a better partner for Yashur: Arandor or Neyra?

Is the mental health of modern civilization more related to Tutankhamun or Ivan the Terrible?

Added 1 minute ago

No, you played well. If it weren't for the clue, I wouldn't have suspected you at all.
I'll give Arandor a failing grade.

Execute Arandor - 2 (Yashur)
Execute Yashur - 6 (Medj, Kosha, Arandor, Master, Nebo)

4 votes are needed for execution.

2.5 hours until the end of the day.

Nebok is either 🕵 or 👳
I am neither 🕵 nor 👳

It's better to write off the loss to a town that thinks the mafia is voting as a group at the end of the game to support their own (even though people have been revealing their teammates in voting for years) and believes that if someone writes a detailed analysis, they must be a town member, and that no one in the mafia chat is helping them write posts or giving them advice. And it doesn't matter that some players almost always play the same way on both sides (approximately), and when they don't, they start referring to real-life situations, etc., after which you're left wondering if they're telling the truth or lying, and that's essentially complete randomness, and writing down your suspicions based on this is a waste of time, because everyone will come to almost the same conclusion, unless a detective writes a more detailed analysis. In general, yesterday I wrote down my opinion, which any other player could easily copy (considering that almost everyone is 50/50) and replace my name with mine, because there isn't much information, except for one town member, the mafia, and the mana. And if a hypothetical protector thinks that he has figured out everyone using some unknown power, then that's sad.

🐸?

But I asked you yesterday what alternative you suggest. You didn't seem to answer.

An alternative was suggested before me, and another one was yesterday (besides Ment), and I was even ready to vote for my own clue in principle, even if it's incorrect, but we all know that even random Barbarians sometimes end up where they need to be.

In general, almost anyone, if there are no categorical objections based on any facts (not assumptions and blind faith).