Knights of Tezoth

-- Fate sends me signs of what is to come, but their essence eludes me. My wisdom here is not enough, so I must seek counsel outside.
After the skirmish with the northerners, which the knight, despite his defeat, was very pleased with -- the main thing is to have a glorious time and personally topple as many opponents as possible, not necessarily to be the last one standing -- Ambrose will try to find the Knight of Wisdom and ask for her advice.

The Riders will hover, and the Invisers will invis, a tale of an indestructible shield and a spear that pierces everything.

/ Tartarus can fly. 100% sure /

It's enough to give griffins passive invisibility ignore)

I can add a passive leap onto hovering animal enemies for the Revnlanders.

/ No need 😠 /

When you jump about thirty centimeters, but the Mantis demands you shoot down a Pegasus at a height of fifty meters. Otherwise, they'll pull your eye onto your ass... That's when you realize the possibilities of the human body are limitless...

Reminding you. Until I get the bonus, I'm not shooting.

To take advantage of a situation, you need to know about it in advance.

I see what crap is flowing through the pipes, and I don't like it. If Nebok agrees and Geroyist hasn't changed his mind, I agree to play on the pegasus under tournament rules, provided that absolutely all NPCs die, including the "friendly" ones and the Astral ones.

No idea how to justify this in terms of common sense in the chronicles, but if it's a choice between chairs like: "tournament win is a guaranteed thing, but everyone is demoralized about playing in the expo" versus "the strongest and the survivor wins, everyone happily keeps playing" — I'll choose the second. But if after the cancellation everyone unanimously and joyfully rushes to counter me as a mob, then I'll be the one to go screw myself.

For Carneia's sake, even jumping to the stars in the sky isn't hard.. oops

I'm not saying you knew or thought about it yourselves. Well, Geroyist remembered, but he's also the one who proposed the no-flight finale. So there are no complaints against you.

I will finish the battle since I promised. But I'd like such rule nuances to be recorded in Competitive posts in the future.

You kept silent for a couple of hours.

You two, as the hosts, wrote the archers off as neutrals yourselves. They had a perfect alliance — the chance to cut their opponents in half, plus farm pumpkins for free, and then burst in with a double move and an imba bow and shoot down all the riders in the finale.

Instead, through their own shortsightedness and arrogance, they made themselves targets, and of course the players are to blame — classic.

I'm not even mentioning that it's not very RP for someone to stab allies in the back after a treaty of alliance for a couple of useless prestige points.

Aren't you tired of provoking and ruining the atmosphere for people from expedition to expedition? You were given unreal rights and privileges, shown respect and honor for your help in running it, so use them and enjoy them, you're already exhausting.

And I said everyone would fall out over the ragefest. It was very obvious.

By the way, I didn't hate the pumpkin until she threw the team under the bus. When I wrote about her imba bow, I meant that what annoys me is specifically the mechanic with free ODs in her bow plus two moves if she plays solo. So yes, if she had been with us, I'd now sit in a preventive attack and shoot at some freezer.

Ah, I need to write the second part of the essay faster, before Carnea pulls something...

Soon, toward the end of the brawl, the flyers will come down, and Orvald will cut them all down with his imba from the Sithian and paralysis lol)