Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
an unscrupulous machine, a fair judge, a silent bookkeeper, not a provocateur without beloved characters, I repeat)
🤣🤣🤣 "Give the victory to mana Stephanie, but not to the mafia Albus folks"...🤣 It's all fine. I just still can't get used to the fact that the expedition is a confrontation of players against the GM's NPCs. That's why some things just don't fit in my head... This goes back to the mafia days, when the town refused to hang maniacs even when they were clearly harmful...
But the town decided to hang the maniac in the person of Chuchundra, whom Revan made a solo player on your recommendations. What are you dissatisfied with?
The Pumpkin does not provoke paralysis on its owner, as it is itself considered the aggressor.
That's clear. The thing is, it's the Frost's turn now and it's definitely going to get hit by 2 Pumpkins. The question is, it makes its move now, two Pumpkins aggro on it, and it's supposed to paralyze them. So I'm wondering, does that work against Pumpkins or not...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
How the player-cheaters hate the GM-cheater. Who, by the way, is now alone against everyone.
Shhh... The "CO'Alition" has decided to dump the rage on Stefania without a fight... Don't interfere!
Actually, Albus folks, Nebok, and Alsira can easily beat me even on horseback.
That's me forgetting about Alaria's knives.
To reach you in flight, you either need to fly yourself, or have a range of 12 like you do. None of the aforementioned can reach you if they lose their "flyer" mid-battle... You already killed one shooter with range 12, and now you want a second one...
Well, is it our fault that in this competition only an imba with a bow and flight can win, which can only be countered by another imba with a bow and flight? The rage has a huge flaw with this, I agree. That's why I originally thought the rule about hovering didn't exist. Alas, one of the wyrms or one of the pegasi will win. That's a sad fact that goes strongly against the essence of the competition.
But here's the question: why did you yourself warn a couple of days ago about Lester or Alaria winning, and now you're talking about dumping to the pegasi? They certainly don't have such tools.
an unscrupulous machine, a fair judge, a silent bookkeeper, not a provocateur without favorite characters, I repeat)
🤣🤣🤣 "Give the victory to mana to Stephanie, but not to the mafia to the Albusians"...🤣 It's all fine. I just still can't get used to the fact that the expedition is a confrontation between players and the GM's NPCs. That's why some things just don't fit in my head... This goes back to the mafia days, when the town didn't want to hang maniacs even when they were clearly harmful...
But the town decided to hang the maniac in the person of Chuchundra, whom, on your recommendations, Revan made a solo player. What are you dissatisfied with?
The fact that I am "dissatisfied with something" is a figment of your imagination. I don't care who wins. But some things are beyond my understanding... Take Candle, for instance. Pings on him from Nebk, you, or Heroist I can understand. But pings on him from Lester, Alaria, or some Lorican are harder for me to grasp... Ples, probably, thinks that Ferlus alone will wipe the floor with you, Heroist, and Nebk...🤣
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).