Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
“Liferism” is always “liferism.” Smaller, larger, average – it’s all the same; the proportions are relative, and the boundaries are blurred. I’m not a saintly recluse; I didn’t just sit locked up in a house my whole life. But if I have to choose between one form of “liferism” and another, I prefer not to choose at all.
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?
Don't the poor hate the rich because they envy them? Obviously, that's exactly why.
A normal poor person would rather say, "Why does this oligarch need all these yachts, planes, and palaces? It would be better if he gave all of that to me," or more likely, "Why does this oligarch need all these yachts and planes? It would be better if I had an old Skoda and a small apartment without a mortgage." And if (when) the statements are different, then it is inconsistent and illogical. Aristotle would be displeased.
Internet friends with whom you can't do anything in real life are the same as friends in visual novels. With whom you also can't do anything in real life. So don't give me that...
Actually, it was possible, and it was done... The question is that this happens extremely rarely and doesn't really help to get out of depression, except perhaps for a short time. And in general, stop making excuses for yourself, you life-ruiner, it's annoying. Others spend all day watching anime and don't even go on forums, and you're acting all high and mighty...
Wow, now they're comparing the beautiful characters from visual novels to walking meat sacks. Smells like gatekeeping...
Both are virtual. And I highly doubt that the characters in visual novels are that perfect. You just love visual novels too much to give an objective assessment.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт Небо – угроз не слышит Небо – ведёт особый счёт Небо – тебя найдёт
A normal, ordinary person wouldn't say, "Why does this oligarch need all these yachts, planes, and palaces? It would be better if I had all of that," but rather, "Why does this oligarch need all these yachts and planes? It would be better if I had an old Skoda and a small apartment without a mortgage." And if (when) the statements are different, then it's inconsistent and illogical. Aristotle would be displeased.
Cop, you wrote the same thing as I did. You just replaced the envious poor people with poor people who aren't envious.
Actually, they could have...
DISGUSTING LIFE-ER!
Others spend all day watching anime and don't even go on forums, and you're here showing off...
And I don't even want to be like that.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт Небо – угроз не слышит Небо – ведёт особый счёт Небо – тебя найдёт
But they are created by flawed people. Can a flawed being create a perfect being? Hardly.
Never mind. By applying certain criteria for evaluation, they can be considered perfect. Let me explain with an example: I have an axe. An excellent axe, sturdy, reliable, heavy, and sharp. I think it's the perfect axe because it fully meets what I expect from an axe. But if I consider the axe not as a working tool, but as something ridiculous? Then it's the most flawed axe: too heavy, too short, and generally deadly and it won't pass any safety inspection. The axe is garbage. When evaluating characters as independent entities, we will inevitably come to the conclusion that they are all flawed to some extent. When evaluating them from the point of view of fulfilling the function of fanservice (for example), we will understand that some of them perfectly satisfy our requirements, because they, as a rule, do not exceed our requirements for axes. Thus, by maximally narrowing the range of requests, we find some aspects of entire entities to be ideal. But the entity, in a comprehensive understanding of the ideal, cannot achieve it. At least, as long as we are not discussing the spheres of religion and metaphysics, but only considering man-made entities.
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza, e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
But they are created by flawed people. Can a flawed being create a perfect being? Hardly.
An interesting line of thought, but I once pondered this and came to a much simpler conclusion: evolution. If we remove all sorts of complex natural processes and religious judgments, we can observe that quite simple organisms eventually gave rise to humans, and therefore nothing prevents them from going further and creating even more perfect creations with their own hands. That's how it should work, in theory.
Not sure about that. It seems more like a technological singularity (humans create advanced AI, which creates even more advanced AI, and so on, ad infinitum), but it's not quite that either. And evolution is natural selection and adaptation of life forms to survive in certain conditions. Cockroaches or tardigrades, for example, are just as much an example of successful evolution as humans. Because it doesn't imply that a life form will necessarily become, for example, smarter. In other words, with evolution, the situation is largely the same as in Alex's example with the axe. As for humans creating some "perfect" life form in general, that's simply impossible. At least because ideas about perfection differ from person to person. I wouldn't be surprised if opinions on this matter differ greatly even among the people here.
Evolution doesn't necessarily equate to biological evolution. And it's funny that the thoughts of a "Heroes" player, exactly in this form, were what I intended to give to one of the characters, if I ever get around to finishing that part... If...
Siverfale
Граф Орлов
