I suggest setting up a voice chat, with players indicating whether they want to participate or not. If we get 16 players, then let's start.
Posts from Streamopal
Auto-translated
It seems that crazy ideas are in vogue. I'll tell you about one of my very old ideas. At the end of each game day, players switch their starting colors. That is, the player who was blue on map 111 becomes red on map 112, then blue again on map 113, and so on. But victory is only possible if the hero arrives when the player is playing with their starting color.
If the main character only uses the starting color, does that turn the game into some kind of "let's play nice"?
I don't know, I haven't tried it. Like any crazy idea, it remained just an idea:D.
The idea described is not at all absurd; at the beginning of my Heroes journey, I only played like this with friends – in hotseat mode, without looking away from the screen during the other player's turn. The games were quite engaging. Moreover, they were shorter – if someone gained an unrecoverable advantage, there was no need to waste time finishing them off.
Memories came flooding back: 5th year of university, deadlines for writing my thesis were looming. And I got a computer. Hotseat, back then it was the second Heroes game, the three of us. We'd sit down at 5 pm and leave around 7 am. I'm still ashamed of the quality of my thesis... It's amazing that they even accepted it... What a blessing that the third Heroes game wasn't out yet; it was released only a year later...
P.S. And about the game itself. I remember that it almost always turned out like this: two players would reach the final, and the third would finish off the winner.
ICQ 716748479
It seems that absurd ideas are in vogue. Let me tell you about one of my very old ideas. At the end of each game day, players switch sides. That is, the player who was blue on map 111 becomes red on map 112, then blue again on map 113, and so on. But victory is only possible if the hero arrives when the player is playing with their starting color.
i.e., when playing as another faction, you need to harm them as much as possible, eliminate all heroes with armies, and transfer money and resources either to your own faction or to the AI that can defeat the opponent... but where is the point in that?
And where is the point in this topic? )))
i.e., when playing as another faction, you need to harm them as much as possible, eliminate all heroes with armies, and transfer money and resources either to your own faction or to the AI that can kill the opponent... but where is the point in that?
:D :D :D
ICQ 716748479
But what's the interest, and where will the intrigue be in the gameplay? The element of surprise will fade. Or is it just for laughs?
The described idea is not nonsense at all; at the beginning of my Heroes journey, I only played like this with friends – in hotseat mode, without looking away from the screen during the opponent's turn. We had quite meaningful games. And they were shorter – if someone gained an unrecoverable advantage, there was no need to waste time finishing them off.
What's the point of this topic? )))
Added after 1 minute
Also, because of questions like these, the rules are not entirely clear – how and how much to play, etc. It seems that the games should be shorter, but will they be short enough to, for example, play a Best of 3? Is a group stage needed, or should it be a single-elimination tournament (depending on the number of participants)?
ICQ:5676388
It's not necessary to legalize stream sniping if every game is played with an experienced host-commentator; then, it will be difficult to cheat – it's a live broadcast, everything is in plain sight!
And introduce regulations for accusations of stream sniping, a judicial committee, and penalties up to and including a ban from HW.
Of course, a corresponding fund will be needed, including salaries for the hosts.


привет, можешь сменить подпись) 6лм - норм шабл, а джебус тупое говно. Я был тотально не прав. © =Lizard=
лето 2012.

