Posts from Forum

Okay, let me say a few words... In general, when both main heroes are dead (if it's obvious that these are the main heroes), I don't like the idea of digging up these specific heroes from the Facebook group! But banning the purchase of other heroes, especially those of level 10+, also seems absurd to me! You might want to fire a well-developed hero for some strategically important reason, but it's not a guaranteed plus. There's a risk that your opponent will buy him, or you might buy him yourself... This is part of the game; there aren't 100% mathematically sound solutions, we're not robots, and we can't calculate everything. You made a mistake with your priority, and then it came back to you. Or, your opponent got the log earlier, and the decision was made to counter this, which was beyond your control. In short, there are many such moments; there's no need to take it to the point of idiocy, especially since I couldn't grasp the specific, clearly calculated justification for the ban... I repeat that consciously buying back main heroes also seems wrong to me. Develop other good heroes and realize the advantage, instead of easily collecting Nats for 2 treasures and giving everything to one hero!

Now, try to formulate your thought as a rule. A rule that is short enough to be remembered at first glance (and not to have to read the regulations under a ticking timer), and at the same time takes into account all possible situations.

For example, it is quite difficult to regulate the concept of "dad" with rules. There can be several "dads." The main "dad" may be behind in development compared to a subordinate "dad."

Or, for example, if a "dad" was caught in the act and pinned down, not allowing him to escape, can he be "dug up"?

And if not a "dad," but a useful pawn (for example, the only portal user). What about him?

And if, in the final, a "dad" was exchanged for a kamikaze pawn, and another "dad" was accidentally locked in a tavern, then what?

And so on and so forth.

Hence, the option I voiced – any hero of level 10 and above is considered a "dad." It's simple, easy to remember, and doesn't cause any side effects.

Just a reminder that the rule should be simple, clear, and have a single interpretation.

Therefore, if anyone can formulate a rule that prevents gambling on a dead main hero in the Fortress Battle, but doesn't prevent digging up weaker heroes from the tavern, I'm all ears.

I couldn't come up with one. If you can, that would be great.

This rule is simply unnecessary.

I don't like the idea of digging up these specific heroes from the Facebook group!

Let's say both mains die in FB, then no one can rebuy either of these mains

Or do you want only people who understand the game to participate in your tournaments?

There are people who disagree with this statement:



And for some reason, their opinion is more valuable to me than yours.

I want my Tournaments to not include people who start writing long posts and demanding their rights over every little thing. Let there be fewer participants, but a healthier atmosphere.

You pull out small snippets from people's messages, even though the overall meaning of their posts was against this rule.

And I don't start writing long posts over every little thing, wake up.

I'll step down and won't participate in any more tournaments with this character.