Posts from Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

Remember, the imbalance introduced in the 4th stage tournament when calculating the ranking according to your system may also affect the results of the entire championship when summarizing the results in the Universal nomination.

Well, from everything written above, I've concluded the following:
to avoid getting stressed, you should always try to take your 1st place,
so that, if anything goes wrong, you won't be left out due to mistakes in the SPR.

2IronAxe
I will not discuss who deserves what rating for which tournament. From everything I've read, I draw 2 conclusions:
1. You have not participated in sporting competitions (or you constantly lost), therefore you cannot understand the role of tournament placement.

2IronAxe
2. You are trying your best to use the results of the 4th stage of BK,

Because you understand that that huge lead was a result of far more than just the difference in skill level. You were simply the only bug-user at the tournament, and the map was very conducive to this. Yes, I am a newbie in 4, but even to me it is obvious that if you didn't have the Pavlov's dog reflex of taking the grave with the spacebar (or if it gave nothing on the map)
, and if you, like me for example, believed in bypassing the hero by using the offloading bug (or both heroes were impassable, not just one), and don't say you didn't doubt at least this question, then there would be no talk of 3 days at all. God grant it takes 5-6, or even more.

Yes, you were stronger, but you were also lucky. A slightly different map, and you would never have created such a lead.

Fear kills the mind.

Well, from everything written above, I've concluded this:
to avoid stressing out, one must always try to take 1st place,
so that in case of anything, you're not left out due to bugs in the SPR.

I don't remember seeing you in the discussions back then, with your amazing mathematical abilities.

And when you saw the state of the tables and the total scores after 5 rounds, you suddenly had the idea to improve the formula. Now think about who is trying to use what to the maximum.

And in the meantime, you haven't forgotten who announced the bug with the ballista in the 3rd game, and thanks to whom everyone started shooting elementals with the ballista in the 3rd game. I didn't use it alone.

Yes, you were lucky in some places. I'm not saying anything. You were lucky in the 4th game. But you didn't get a bonus of 28 points there.

And also. Why are you picking on the 4th game and on me?

Of course, it's necessary... it's just that sometimes there is no desire to read "arguments and squabbles"... and many of the issues being discussed would be better seen in tables, not in phrases!

P.S. The creator promised to restore the morale system soon, and many of the posts (Fireball, IronAxe, AmberSoler) will participate in the "who can get the biggest morale penalty" competition.

I have already written that I started discussing the rating only for the reason that none were accepted. If the organizers write back now that a certain system has been chosen, I will never contest it.

And what is this for? I don't know about the others, but I realized I would be blasting Elementals with a ballista during the first hour of scouting, considering it normal. And then you popped up with your discussion, from which I understood that this might be a bug. And I was waiting for a decision on this matter.

The only tournament where it can be said that I was lucky is the 4s (and even then the question isn't resolved, I would have preferred a slightly different map). Only my "luck" irritates you greatly (how many posts have you spent crying that a noob shouldn't be given so many points?), while you've somehow forgotten about your own.

Am I the one nitpicking???

And how many times do I have to repeat that I agree to ANY OFFICIALLY ACCEPTED system. And I absolutely officially declare (in my right mind and memory) that, from my point of view, the most interesting (although incorrect) choice would be IronAxe's system. You can now use this quote in your own interests.

If there is an official competition of systems, then such tables will certainly appear.

Perhaps you are right. But personally, I have never lowered morale and will not do so.

but still, I hope for a new formula ... or some improvement to the existing system ....

Iron, as an organizer of online tournaments, I'll say this about "if you want to have a ranking system," we already have one; there's a ranking table for the 3-player online games, which I created on this resource.

And if you're so blind that you didn't see this, and you don't even understand how it could have happened without your 25-page participation, then I'm sorry... if you're stuck on offline games, it's not my fault. And comments like, "Hey, online organizers, I'm so brilliant, I've come up with something amazing and I'm giving you a ranking system" are completely irrelevant.

Of course, :smile19: Deleted :smile19: you and Amber can have another unproductive discussion that leads nowhere, spanning another 50 pages, and return to the same point 100 times, but I won't participate in that, and you can just present me with the fact when you've agreed on something: that everything you came up with is not good, but we, the super-minds, have come up with something, and now everything needs to be calculated in that way. In that case, I will naturally have to comply and calculate it the way you want.

And on the third attempt, you realized you were going to blast away with a ballista that had infinite ammunition, but you kept quiet and didn't even consider whether it was a bug or a feature. Like, if I hadn't come out, you would have quietly taken advantage of this bug-feature, which, by the way, not everyone knew about.

And who, am I?

What's up, are you stuck trying to come up with a super-formula?

You'd better say that, from your point of view, the most interesting (and flawed) and the most correct thing would be to choose the Amber system. Or are you still making up your own formula? I'll tell you that if you remove LOCATION from the parameters, you can expect success.

Please provide links to the description of your system and to the online player ranking table. I don't read online forum threads, but I corresponded with several online players, and they didn't mention that you also have a rating system. That's why I thought there wasn't one. I'm just interested in seeing the rankings of my online friends.

What's the point of hoping? The question now is: there are three systems, and we need to choose one. Because mathematicians might spend five years coming up with the perfect formula. But we need to calculate the rating now :)

The administration has arrived and is stating its firm opinion:
2. The further you go into the forest, the thicker the partisans become. From everything said above, I only understood the following: it is necessary to introduce some "curvature" into the "linear" component and make it non-linear.

3. Offline and online ratings should be independent. Adelaide has developed her own system that is perfectly suited for online play. You shouldn't impose offline formulas on her.

4. A bonus that takes into account the strength of the Tournament is still necessary. And no one has yet put forward arguments against its improved version. We would like to hear constructive criticism.

Well, for me, it makes sense... and that's probably more important ;)
since they didn't decide on the choice before the start of the tournament, nothing terrible will happen if I choose before the last stage....:)

IronAxe;104337Please provide links to the description of your system and to the table of online player rankings.