Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I have already written that I started discussing the rating only for the reason that none were accepted. If the organizers write back now that a certain system has been chosen, I will never contest it.

Well, that's great. But why accuse me of discussing rating systems and pointing out that my system has fewer flaws because, according to mine, my point lead over YOU is greater? While according to Ambera's system, your lead over Alex_R is greater :) and at the same time, the point gap between us is smaller :) That's why it's beneficial for you to ignore the flaws in Ambera's system, but at the same time accuse my system of not calculating the rating very accurately because the formula uses few parameters :)

And what is this for? I don't know about the others, but I realized I would be blasting Elementals with a ballista during the first hour of scouting, considering it normal. And then you popped up with your discussion, from which I understood that this might be a bug. And I was waiting for a decision on this matter.

To the point that you say I'm a great bug-user and that's why I got so lucky in the 4s stage. To this, I answer that I provided links to the bug-features before the start of the 4s tournament. Anyone could have familiarized themselves. And in the 3s, you realized you would be blasting with a ballista with infinite ammo but kept quiet and didn't even wonder if it was a bug or a feature. Like, if I hadn't popped up, you would have secretly used the bug-feature, which, by the way, not everyone knew about.

The only tournament where it can be said that I was lucky is the 4s (and even then the question isn't resolved, I would have preferred a slightly different map). Only my "luck" irritates you greatly (how many posts have you spent crying that a noob shouldn't be given so many points?), while you've somehow forgotten about your own.

I don't give a damn about your luck and I'm not crying; I'm using this as an example to show the flaws of Ambera's system on a real rating table based on his system. And you just keep attacking me saying I was lucky. What am I to blame for? That I was lucky enough to raise the bar a bit higher in that tournament? Well, you could have raised the bar in other versions where I play worse. I could say the same thing to the leaders of other versions—that they were lucky. And you were also lucky that there were more strong players in other tournaments (for 2s, 3s, 5s). Had they not been there, I would have taken second place there :), and according to Ambera's system, I would also have gotten a freebie for the PLACE :)

Am I the one nitpicking???

And who else—me?

:smile19: Removed :smile19:

And how many times do I have to repeat that I agree to ANY OFFICIALLY ACCEPTED system. And I absolutely officially declare (in my right mind and memory) that, from my point of view, the most interesting (although incorrect) choice would be IronAxe's system. You can now use this quote in your own interests.

You'd better declare that the most interesting (FLAWED), from your point of view, and the most correct choice would be Amber's system. Or are you still composing your own formula? I'll say that if you remove PLACE from the parameters, you can count on success :)

If there is an official competition of systems, then such tables will certainly appear.

They already exist if you haven't noticed. Across five stages for three systems. And Alex_R has probably already checked the 4s results for all three systems :)

:smile19: Removed :smile19:

Perhaps you are right. But personally, I have never lowered morale and will not do so.

Neither will I :) I don't play the "lowering morale" game, but if I like something, I might raise it :)

Added after 2 minutes

but still, I hope for a new formula ... or some improvement to the existing system ....

What's the point in hoping. The question now is this—there are three systems, and one must be chosen from them. Because mathematicians might take five years to compose an ideal formula. But we need to calculate the rating right now :)