Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

The administration has arrived and is stating its firm opinion:
2. The further you go into the forest, the thicker the partisans become. From everything said above, I only understood the following: it is necessary to introduce some "curvature" into the "linear" component and make it non-linear.

You have already tried to do this by introducing a bonus that takes into account the strength of the Tournament using the results of previous games. However, since your formula still contains the part that accounts for the PLACE in the Tournament, the results are not much different from the Amber system's results. I showed on real examples what the flaws of this part of the formula are. Although, in itself, your bonus does not seem to give such an increase to the actual result as Amber (in his case, the bonus sometimes even exceeds the points for the player's actual result).
Well, okay, let those who want develop it and present the final formula – we will discuss it :) But if it is implemented by the end of the Canighem Tournament and the results are calculated based on it, then this is not entirely correct because players chose their rating strategy based on the three systems already presented, although I am not against it; otherwise, they will say again that I am worried about my own result.

3. Offline and online ratings should be independent. Adelaide has developed her own system that is perfectly suited for online play. You shouldn't impose offline formulas on her.

I didn't impose anything. I just didn't know that there was already some kind of ranking here for online play, so I suggested the Amber system.

4. A bonus that takes into account the strength of the Tournament is still necessary. And no one has yet put forward arguments against its improved version. We would like to hear constructive criticism.

I showed the flaws that the parameter "occupied place" introduces using REAL examples; what other constructive criticism do you need? As for the revised formula, I haven't seen a single real table yet. Well, recalculate all the results of the Canighem stages according to it, then we’ll see what it produces. Although, I don't understand where the flaw resulting from the occupied place can disappear to.

Added 6 minutes ago

Well, for me, it makes sense... and that's probably more important ;)
since they didn't decide on the choice before the start of the tournament, nothing terrible will happen if I choose before the last stage....:)

This only indicates that you will choose the system in which your personal result looks better. The three options already used were proposed BEFORE the start of the Canighem Tournament. And nobody knew how things would turn out, including the developers of these systems :)

Added 6 minutes ago

IronAxe;104337Please provide links to the description of your system and to the table of online player rankings.

/topic/2455/[/url]
Here, take a look and show it to your online friends who didn't know about it. I looked at the table, thank you. But what about the request for a link to the description of your system – how it works and how it calculates? Will you provide it?