Added 5 minutes later
Funny, but true.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
normal, lol. It's both funny and sad.
I've probably watched several thousand Google photos in the last two months. About 80% are duplicates. The rest either don't fit or are too complicated. The same flower petals need to be curved in two planes, with a separate matrix for each... And the choice of available materials is limited - acrylic stone, plywood.
The whole point is to create something unusual with minimal costs. Buying it is not an option by definition.
And this, the shape of the lamp in the photo is not necessarily final. You can twist it however you want - even a sphere, even a swastika...
acrylic stone, plywood.
And they won't have a refrigerator or stove in the apartment for another month.
I was standing at the window during my lunch break today, looking at the city traffic. I saw a girl in a white t-shirt and a skirt (maybe it was a dress) and watched her walk, her chest bouncing. I thought that standing at the window and watching the street was a pretty good way to spend time.
Do you have a microwave?
Advice from the book "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck"

it's not about "not giving a fuck" it's about realising what to give a fuck about and remaining calm whilst your doing it
That's what this book is all about, too. Finding out what to give a fuck about.
'Not giving a fuck' would be nihilism, no?
Nihilism would be believing that giving a fuck (or not giving a fuck for that matter) is pointless.
No, nihilism is the belief that the only thing worth giving a fuck about is power and applying it in your rational self interest.
For a nihilist, there is simply no interesting difference between giving a fuck and not giving a fuck.
So when you see a nihilist who gives a fuck you should not be surprised. To have a piece of gum stuck in your pubic hair is irritating no matter what.
Anyone who tries to convince you to give a fuck about anything except acquiring and deploying power in your rational self interest is trying to dominate you.
Obviously, all of this is true, but if Obsidian had needed to develop FONV from scratch, they'd probably not have been able to do it. FO3 was what it needed to be to make it across the finish line, and FONV was enabled to be what it was by that success. No game developer has infinite resources, and where you have to devote resources to making the game engine, you necessarily lose resources to devote to story development. Therefore, although of course NV is more complex and impressive story-wise, 3 should rightly get a lot of credit for laying the foundation for it.
What I was going to say. New Vegas is good because of Fallout 3 not despite it.
Why isn't anyone talking about the fourth installment? Was it such a failure that no one even wants to mention it?
Why isn't anyone talking about the fourth installment? Was it such a failure that no one even wants to mention it?