Skip to content

Posts from Weapon (d4) Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
What weapon would you prefer to fight with?
20 voters
Single choice Public votes Closed 2014-02-14
This poll is closed.
long swords (+bastard sword)
25% 5 votes
short swords (+dagger)
15% 3 votes
katanas, wakizashi, and other Asian swords
10% 2 votes
sabers, yatagans, etc.
0% 0 votes
rapiers, foils
10% 2 votes
axes, hatchets
5% 1 vote
maces, clubs
5% 1 vote
hammers
5% 1 vote
knuckles, flails
0% 0 votes
spears, halberds, naginatas, glaives
5% 1 vote
staves, sometimes fists
10% 2 votes
bows, crossbows, slings
10% 2 votes
In reply to Arandor
User Avatar
#62
Auto-translated
Arandor
You could even attach a member to it; it would make an excellent weapon. You could poke it in the enemy's face.
Exactly. Now I know what my boss from my previous job was armed with. But don't poke it in the face; instead, insert it into the brain. Like a true brainsex.

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

User Avatar
#63
Auto-translated
I don't understand your twisted fantasies, Arandor. But if you really want to know, it's a halberd.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



User Avatar
#64
Auto-translated
Are you sick? Are you talking about my posts? Maybe I should revive the threads about sexual preferences? Here, just say it like that from the start. "Halberdier" is good, well done.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#66
Auto-translated
2Set
I also like this option, but not halberds, but rather spears, naginatas, or glaives, so that it's just a blade. But I'm not voting yet, because I also like two other options.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#68
Auto-translated
Ar, just remember that a glaive is a one-sided weapon and has nothing in common with the two-sided inventions of Perumov and others. Ments, naginatas and halberds are different weapons. Naginata is for cavalry, it's inconvenient for infantry, while a halberd, on the contrary, is for infantry. And, by the way, as a rule, the weapons in Europe are better.

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

User Avatar
#69
Auto-translated
Yeah, I don't need them on both sides. I don't want to have my legs cut off.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#70
Auto-translated
some naginatas or glaives
The glaive is mentioned as the favorite weapon of the main character of Nick Perumov's pentology "Guardian of Swords," Kair Laed, also known as the warrior of the Gray League of Fess, and also as the necromancer Neyasyt.

I can also take a glaive; it's good too.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



User Avatar
#71
Auto-translated
I know they are different, but they are listed under the same category. Although, I didn't know that the naginata was for cavalry (it's not like that in Total War...).

Added 2 minutes later
Yes, it seems that's not actually the case.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#72
Auto-translated
TW is certainly quite realistic, but it's still a computer game. Sat, Fess has heresy in his hands, not a glaive.

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

User Avatar
#73
Auto-translated
I might even take a glaive, it's also good.
You quoted someone who is a necro-pedo-zoophile and likes to use incorrect glaives, and that's why he wanted a glaive?
Ar, just remember that a glaive is a one-sided weapon and has nothing to do with Perumov's and others' two-sided inventions.
The funniest thing is that Perumov's glaives aren't the most idiotic. Because Blizzard, for some reason, called those Illidan's things glaives (which, if they resemble any weapon, it's a yue).

Added 1 minute ago
TW is quite realistic, of course.
In my opinion, it's not realistic enough. Remember the burning pigs, or what the onagers do.
User Avatar
#74
Auto-translated
necro-pedo-zoophile
Necromancer

Can't you read?
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#75
Auto-translated
Ple-Sen
The funniest thing is that Perumov's glaives aren't the most ridiculous. Because, for some reason, Blizzard called those Illidan's things "glaives" (which, if they resemble any weapon, it's a yue).
Yes, Blizzard's weapons in Warcraft and, especially, in World of Warcraft are just plain awful. At the same time, it was Blizzard that created the fantasy RPG with the most realistic weapons and armor - Diablo 2. Yes, the artifacts there are quite strange, and the armor doesn't always look good on the characters, but in the inventory, ordinary weapons and armor are made with a focus on realism and are simply excellent.

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

User Avatar
#76
Auto-translated
You should rather read a book (it's not very good, but you should like it), and then you would understand what I'm talking about.

Added 2 minutes later
Yes, Blizzard's weapons in Warcraft and, especially, in World of Warcraft are just ridiculously over the top. At the same time, it was Blizzard that created the fantasy RPG with the most realistic weapons and armor - Diablo 2. Yes, the artifacts there are quite strange, and the armor doesn't always look good on the characters, but in the inventory, ordinary weapons and armor are made with a focus on realism and are simply excellent.
Well, yes, the designs are probably the most eye-watering of all the other games in the Warcraft series. Glass, ebony, and chitin armor would make Morrowind look tame.