Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
Upload it to the forum; it won't let me upload it this way. It says that your image for the third game has an 18+ rating. I bet there are naked dendroids in it.
No, relative to the ground. Air cannot be taken as a reference frame. Imagine the wind is blowing. Relative to the air flow, the plane is moving, but relative to the ground, it is not.
Ho-ho, so what if the flow suddenly becomes so strong that it lifts the plane into the air, then who cares about the surface of the earth? Another thing is that you won't fly that far, but the fact of takeoff remains.
And on the runway, the speed of the plane will be 0, which means the impulse will also be zero.
It won't be, and that's what I'm saying.
And in general, your phrase "No matter how hard we try, their speeds (wheels and runway) will never be the same" contradicts the condition. Because we are told that the speeds are equal.
Yes, the condition is incorrect in this formulation; we cannot fulfill it; we can only try unsuccessfully.
Well, if it doesn't let you, then it's probably the provider or viruses, so maybe that's the case?
Yeah, that's it. Well, you can probably teleport there or use angel wings; that's probably what the map creators had in mind.
Ho-ho, so what if the updraft is so strong that it lifts the plane into the air, then who cares about the ground? It's a different matter that you won't fly very far, but the fact remains that it took off.
but there is no such wind
No, and I'm saying that.
relative to the ground
Yes, the condition is incorrect in this formulation; we cannot fulfill it; we can only try unsuccessfully.
No, so what? This is an extreme case; in another extreme case, with zero wind, you can still observe relative to the air. Obviously, this applies to all intermediate cases as well.
i.e., it won't take off
That is, it will take off, but the wheels will rotate faster than the fabric; we won't meet the condition for equal speeds.
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
I have a feeling I'll be searching for that specific episode of "Destroyers of Legends" tonight.
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
A wing needs an airflow, but not just any airflow, but one in a strictly defined direction.
Mona is right, it doesn't matter at all. As already mentioned, acceleration occurs relative to the air, not relative to the ground. The only thing is, if the wind is very strong and at the same time inconsistent, that is, constantly changing its direction, there may be some problems, yes.
It can't fly at all, as the lift needed for takeoff is ten times higher than theoretically possible. Don't believe me - ask Aripetru.
Yes, I remember that ))))
I think I'll be looking for that MythBusters episode tonight.
Yes, they have many cool episodes of this kind. One myth check about jumping off a falling bridge is worth it.