Voting on whether to ban the mapmaker and the Fortress faction. — Tournament History

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!

Single choice Public votes

This poll is closed.

yes, bro

66.7% 44 votes

No, I don’t want to turn it into a WotG mod

33.3% 22 votes

1
2
3
4
Next
Last

Сатир

12 years ago

Auto-translated

This issue has been brewing for a long time and needs to be resolved through a democratic vote. Let's put all the "i's" in their places, cut through this Gordian knot, and cross the Rubicon. Forward, brothers and sisters!

Dark

12 years ago

Auto-translated

because they voted for days :DDDDDDDDDDDDD

Scorpiona

12 years ago

Auto-translated

and how to play as Anarchy?:)

In reply to Scorpiona

Dirty_Player

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Scorpiona

how do you play as Anarchy?:)

just don't connect the module, and that's it.

Егор Коробейников

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Just to avoid being at the bottom, I voted against it; it's so easy to manipulate me.

rebellious

12 years ago

Auto-translated

What’s the point of the vote if the feature has already been removed by a mod?

In reply to rebellious

Сатир

12 years ago

Auto-translated

rebellious

What's the point of voting if they've already been removed by a mod?

Which mod are you talking about, m200? The point is that they should be removed in the next patch, or whatever it's called, because the game will soon require it as a mandatory rule.

Сатир

12 years ago

Auto-translated

I think we can summarize the results of the vote. The community has made its choice in favor of banning the Cartographer and the Hill Fort. I don't quite understand what guided those who voted against it and why there were so many of them. But that's not the point. It should be noted that all the strong Heroes players, except for Bishop, voted for the ban. Therefore, a big request to WiZarDX_576: in the next version of the HotA patch, please remove the Cartographer and the Hill Fort. We can probably close this thread now.

Snooppy

12 years ago

Auto-translated

It would be good if they weren't just removed, but replaced with something else, so that the value wouldn't be lost... Otherwise, what's the point?

In reply to Snooppy

Wicc

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Snooppy

It would be better if, instead of simply removing them, something else was generated in their place, so that the value wouldn't be lost.... Otherwise, what's the point?

When objects are removed from zaobjts.txt (or whatever this file is called in the Conflux editor), the value doesn't disappear; it's filled with other objects from the same range.

WiZarDX_576

12 years ago

Auto-translated

I'll talk to Pete about this. Removing it will take about 5 minutes. P.S. They are removed programmatically. And yes, the value doesn't disappear – another object is generated within the same range.

In reply to Wicc

Snooppy

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Wicc

When objects are removed from zaobjts.txt (or whatever this file is called in SoD), the value doesn't disappear; it's filled with other objects from the same range.

Okay, that's good!

10 characters

In reply to Сатир

Pit for LM

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Satyr

We can probably close the thread now.

I will close the thread in the morning of October 10th. All our votes according to the rules last for a month. The deadlines should have been discussed when creating the thread.
At this point, only half of the players have voted (compared to the Fort poll /topic/10512/, which had 111 responses). Only 3 or 4 votes were added yesterday.

Satyr

I don't quite understand what those who voted against were guided by and why there are so many of them.

Maybe someone will be able to explain their point of view.

Also, here arises the question of the required percentage. I am writing for the third time that, according to our adopted rule, 75% of the votes are required to make changes to the rules of online games.

In reply to Pit for LM

PReDS

12 years ago

Auto-translated

In that case, please disregard my vote: I only checked the box against the ban to see the voting results, after Satir's post summarizing the results, deciding that it wouldn't affect anything anymore.

In reply to PReDS

KobRa_RR

12 years ago

Auto-translated

PReDS

Then please disregard my vote: I only checked the box against the ban to see the voting results, after Satir posted the summary, deciding that it wouldn't affect anything anymore.

You can see the PReDS results even without voting.