Posts from Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Judging by the screenshot, where his gray hair is visible, it's clear that he's defending the GO = techport.

Dark just posted a crooked screenshot where the blue hero supposedly tries to take a pile of gold. But he didn't go there, and was killed on the spot where he stands on the reds' turn. The blue hero managed to move between the horses and the bears, and collect some resources there (next to the horses). If the blue hero had taken the pile of gold that is aimed at in the screenshot, this save wouldn't even be discussed, as has already been said.

Then explain, on what grounds would he appeal the technical support decision by going down?

Am I correct in understanding that in this generation, the steeds guard both the off-road and the road, and it was possible to travel along the road with Dark?

The horses don't guard, they protect both the road and the off-road path.

There isn't really a guaranteed outcome (GO) between them; Dark Knights on the road isn't a guaranteed outcome for Misrael... but a guaranteed outcome for a dead-end secondary target.

Dark simply posted a crooked screenshot showing a blue hero supposedly trying to take a pile of gold. But he didn't go there; he was killed at the spot where he stands on the reds' turn. The blue hero managed to move between the horses and the bears, and collected some resources there (next to the horses). If the blue hero had taken the pile of gold that the screenshot is aimed at, this save wouldn't even be discussed, as has already been said.

The idea is that in that case AC would not have hesitated in its decision and would have immediately given Dark a tech loss.
That is, the point of skd's sarcasm was precisely that currently Dark is appealing (disputing the decision regarding) the re for the encounter, which you proposed to him. And there he would be disputing the tech loss that AC would have given him without thinking twice.
He would have had no grounds, the joke was about something else.

Do I understand correctly that in this generation the horses guard impassable terrain, but walking on the road was allowed for Dark?

Judging by the screenshot where the gray ones are visible, this is an obvious overstep into ГО = tech loss.

Aaah, well then it's clear, Dark doesn't have the concept of a common passage ;) For him, there are several of them there (remembering one case on Jebus :smile08: ). Then there's only one option: Understand and Forgive :D

remembering this variant that I also gave to several respected and knowledgeable Jebus players, like Hellight, so players basically :))) So to your great joy, they disagree with you and Kostya, well, that's also for you just in case:cool: You're probably right, neither Hell nor I nor the rest understand Jebus... no experience, well, nothing, we'll try

At the time of the attack, Dark was absolutely certain that he had entered someone else's territory.

However, he couldn't be completely sure whether Adel was currently in someone else's territory.

Covering up his obvious violation (even if unintentional) with a possible violation by his opponent and "giving him a free pass" is, at the very least, unsportsmanlike, and in the case of a tournament judge, it's simply unacceptable! If he saw that he accidentally trespassed, he should have written something like, "I accidentally entered, I won't go there, no auto-move," that's how a judge should act, not whine about an auto-move while claiming that the opponent violated the rules.

If, at the moment the controversial situation arose, we had simply saved the game and given the save file to the judges to review, everyone would have calmly accepted any decision they made.