Posts from Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes. Auto-translated

I believe that the map from the third stage, "Galthran," deserves a separate mention in the ranking as the most challenging and time-consuming. The other three maps share common principles (emphasis on logistics + logical tasks tied to conducting relatively simple battles), which allows for combining these tasks into a single overall rating...

The fifth stage will again have a combat focus, which will allow for combining the ratings of the fifth and third stages.

Therefore, I believe it is possible to create two independent assessments, which will be taken into account in the main ranking:

1. Overall rating of 1+2+4
2. Overall rating of 3+5

What do you think about this?

You read my mind. I didn't express them earlier because I needed the data from the fifth stage. So, everything looks very logical and consistent.

In my opinion. Since I consider the 4th stage to be one of the most difficult, it's better to do it this way:
1+2+5;
3+4.
P.S. The 5th stage with 4 battles, I don't think it will cause much difficulty:)

P.S. Are you already writing the description?

I believe that the third stage map, "Galthran," deserves a separate mention in the ranking as the most challenging and time-consuming. The other three maps share common principles (focus on logistics + logical puzzles involving relatively simple battles), which allows for combining these tasks into a single overall ranking...

The fifth stage will again have a combat focus, which will allow for combining the rankings of the fifth and third stages.

Therefore, I believe it is possible to create two independent assessments, which will be taken into account in the main ranking:

1. Overall ranking of 1+2+4
2. Overall ranking of 3+5

What do you think about this?

I believe that the map from the third stage, "Galthran," deserves a separate mention in the ranking as the most challenging and time-consuming. The other three maps share common principles (emphasis on logistics + logical tasks tied to conducting relatively simple battles), which allows for combining these tasks into a single overall rating...

I think it would be best to do it this way:
- Total rating based on the results of all five stages.

I agree with IronAxe, I'm in favor of not reinventing the wheel and doing this:
Total rating based on the results of all five stages

Even though I don't stand a chance in Heroes 4 and 5, I'm with you. Especially if you remember the first, second, and fifth rounds.

Hmm, what are you talking about? About Van Caneghem...?

But we're actually talking about blitz... :)

If there was something to criticize, I would. I just don't agree with all the points of the rules. Otherwise, everything is fine.

Such Tournaments should be encouraged, and participants should be given a rating for 5 blitzes, as if it were one standard official Tournament - based on what they achieve in 5 blitzes. I spent about 5-7 days, not full days, completing 5 blitzes. Completing standard Tournaments takes me much more time.

Yes, I understood that, I just made a typo last night, I'm just glitching now - my vacation has started :) - I'm just relaxing before I leave.

A rating in 5-7 days? That's up to the organizers, but in my opinion: if they don't give a rating for online tournaments after 2-2.5 months, then 5-7 days for a blitz tournament seems reasonable :smile18:

I'd rather it be sooner... we don't need any more glitches:smile50:
and you need to take care of your health;)

:) Don't confuse the sour with the bland :) An online tournament is one thing, and an offline tournament is another. Naturally, the rating systems for different types of tournaments should be different.

Yeah, you have enough glitches of your own without me :D

A rating in 5-7 days? That's up to the organizers, but in my opinion: if they don't award a rating for online tournaments after 2-2.5 months, then 5-7 days for a blitz tournament seems too short.

How different should these systems be? ... so different that one would award points, and the other wouldn't?