Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I believe that the third stage map, "Galthran," deserves a separate mention in the ranking as the most challenging and time-consuming. The other three maps share common principles (focus on logistics + logical puzzles involving relatively simple battles), which allows for combining these tasks into a single overall ranking...

The fifth stage will again have a combat focus, which will allow for combining the rankings of the fifth and third stages.

Therefore, I believe it is possible to create two independent assessments, which will be taken into account in the main ranking:

1. Overall ranking of 1+2+4
2. Overall ranking of 3+5

What do you think about this?

I think it should be done like this:
- Overall ranking based on the results of all five stages.
Within the overall ranking:
1. 1+2+4 (or other options depending on the players' opinions), with the award of a title such as "honorary logistician or scout":).
2. 3+5 (similar to point 1), with the award of the title "best commander":).
Otherwise, it would be necessary to create two thematic blitzes with a separate ranking for each.

In my opinion: the third map did not have too many extremely difficult battles; it was necessary to choose the right path and calculate the losses and gains in battles, which could be achieved through experimental attempts (the more, the better) - hence the time-consuming nature.