HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

    Loads video thumbnails from YouTube, which lets it see your IP address. Off until you turn it on, and remembered in this browser only.

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery

Everything about everything.
4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
User Avatar
Offline Arandor
Registered:
Posts: 60,154
#60619
Auto-translated
If I saw such a version of the picture in the game itself, I might still have some doubts, as it would seem strange to me. But as it is, I took it for someone's fan creation. With the same success, they could have changed any other picture, including the ones you cited as examples. But who knows, maybe someone from the development team created it; it's also unknown.

Be strong. Believe
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Саня Изи
Registered:
Posts: 7,772
#60620
Auto-translated
Mortulus's height is unlikely to exceed 150 cm.

You're just like Dark Jack.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Siverfale
Registered:
Posts: 12,261
#60621
Auto-translated
I couldn't imagine that the game developers could create such a card for their game.
So, its censored version isn't sexualized at all? When you look at it, do you think, "Yes, this is decent clothing for a 14-year-old girl. There isn't a gram of pedophilia in it"?
Let's start with the fact that childhood doesn't necessarily have to be indicated by any clothing.
Yes, but something should indicate it, clothing was just an example. But nothing indicates it, except for your personal experience with classmates.
Let me ask another question. You yourself wrote that there are "isolated cases." And when you saw the picture in the contest, your first thought wasn't, "Maybe this is an isolated case," but "Damn, this damn pedophile is sending his pictures again"?
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Siverfale
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,947
#60622
Auto-translated
Ah, if only I could see the potential for

Moderated: PROFANITY in the message

fun
everywhere, I would be proud of humanity.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
0
⚖️
1
In reply to Wistrit
User Avatar
Offline Siverfale
Registered:
Posts: 12,261
#60623
Auto-translated
Wistrit
Ah, if only I could see the potential for

Moderated: INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE in the message

something
 everywhere, I would be proud of humanity.
Be proud, because that is what allows us all to exist.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Siverfale
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,947
#60624
Auto-translated
As if the existence of humanity is something good.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
0
⚖️
1
User Avatar
Offline Драккошка
Registered:
Posts: 32,020
#60625
Auto-translated
+

Oh, it's Vistrit. Then -
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Arandor
Registered:
Posts: 60,154
#60626
Auto-translated
If we're talking about the censored version, the game has many similar costumes, even more revealing ones. I can't exactly remember who wears them now, but against the backdrop of so many costumes, such details don't stand out, unlike the lack of clothing.
And since you knew about that map, because you chose it somehow, apparently you'd seen it before, but for some reason you ended up not sending the original. It just seems a bit odd that you supposedly thought it was original, yet somehow managed to find that specific one. So you're saying you didn't know such a map existed, but you found it anyway? That part isn't entirely clear.

But nothing points to it
Face/physique. In this case, the norm/average is taken as the baseline, not individual cases.

And when you saw the pic in the contest, your first thought wasn't "maybe this is an isolated case," but "oh god, not again, this damn pedophile(s) sending their pics"?
Given the experience of past contests (in terms of content) and that this is HeroesWorld, along with the kinds of "jokes" that have been in contests over the years, then yes, I didn't think otherwise. I assumed it was just another joke.

Be strong. Believe
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Siverfale
Registered:
Posts: 12,261
#60627
Auto-translated
If we're talking about the censored version, there are many similar outfits in the game, even more revealing ones. I can't remember exactly which characters wear them right now, but with so many outfits, these details don't stand out, unlike the absence of clothing.
So, that statement is correct.
When you look at it, do you think, "Yes, this is decent clothing for a 14-year-old girl. There isn't a hint of pedophilia in it"?
Right?
And since you knew about this map, you must have chosen it somehow, you must have seen it, but for some reason, you ended up sending a non-original version. It just seems a bit strange that you supposedly thought it was original, but somehow managed to find this specific one. Like, you didn't know such a map existed, but you found it anyway? This part isn't very clear.
I'll explain, although this part shows my lack of intelligence. I didn't understand how to open the high-resolution version of the map images from the portal-shadowverse website, so I searched for the image on Google and then sent Revan the first high-resolution (relatively) version I found. As I mentioned before, I didn't even notice the difference between the original and my version. I figured that the nudity in the small map was probably less noticeable than in the larger resolution, and that's all.
Face/body type. In this case, the basis is a normal/average appearance, not individual cases.
First, following that logic, you could label any mare as a schoolgirl because most of the schoolgirls we see these days look like they're 20, right?
Second, your statistics are worthless because my life experience shows the opposite - I'm surrounded by small, flat-chested women, and they're all adults.
Third, let me ask you, how do you determine the age of anime pictures by their faces?
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Саня Изи
Registered:
Posts: 7,772
#60628
Auto-translated
Has anyone played Heroes 7?
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Arandor
Registered:
Posts: 60,154
#60629
Auto-translated
Is that so?
I don't think about it when I see them in the game, and I don't think about the appropriateness of the costume. But at a contest, I had to pay attention because it's expected.
I decided that probably nudity on a small map was just less noticeable than in a large resolution, that's all.
Are you playing on your phone?
Firstly, following that logic, you can label any mare as a schoolgirl because most of the schoolgirls you see these days look 20, right?
I doubt that's true for most. But there may be more of them than the opposite, I don't know.
around me, there are only small, flat-chested girls
Maybe you're just big?

Thirdly, let me know how you determine the age of anime pictures by their faces.
The same way everyone else does.

If it were the original version, the rating would be a little higher, if you're curious. But considering the nudity and my attitude towards this picture as a joke, the rating turned out to be appropriate, that's all.

Be strong. Believe
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Siverfale
Registered:
Posts: 12,261
#60630
Auto-translated
I don't think about it when I see them in the game, and I don't think about the appropriateness of the costume. But at a contest, I have to pay attention because it's required.
So, if I sent a censored version to the contest, would you say:
"Yes, this is appropriate clothing for a 14-year-old girl. There is not a gram of pedophilia in it"?
Right?
Maybe you're just big.
Maybe. But being flat-chested doesn't really change that, and I repeat, the fake in my picture looks more developed than some, a rather significant, part of my female acquaintances.
I doubt it about the majority. But there might be more of them than the opposite cases, I don't know.
So, does that mean it's okay after all?
Just like all the other faces.
In these pictures, the eyes take up half the face, and there are no noses; how are you going to determine anything? By the way, about faces – you don't see anything childish in the girl from Mentat, right?
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Arandor
Registered:
Posts: 60,154
#60631
Auto-translated
Is this okay?
I wouldn't pay much attention to it, as I mentioned at the beginning that the assessment is based on the face. Body type can only help determine age, and nothing more.
If you had sent a censored version, I would have given it a 3-4.
So, does that mean it's okay after all?
More than small, but less than medium. So, not quite.

In these pictures, the eyes take up half the face, and there are no noses. How are you going to determine anything? By the way, about faces - don't you see anything childish in the girl from Ment?
I do.
But as I said, in your case, the rating could have been higher if there was a censored version.

Be strong. Believe
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Драккошка
Registered:
Posts: 32,020
#60632
Auto-translated


Meanwhile, Kosha is battling autism. I'm posting the process just for fun; check out how carefully and precisely I create the outline.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Siverfale
Registered:
Posts: 12,261
#60633
Auto-translated
I wouldn't pay attention to that, because I mentioned at the beginning that the assessment is based on the face. Body type can only help determine age, nothing more.
Interesting. I don't pay attention to such things, which is why I sent this picture without any ulterior motive. You also don't pay attention to such things, but you carefully examined her body type and gave her an age of 14.
And that's not all. Since you pay so much attention to the face, it turns out that you would have noticed it anyway. And, as you yourself wrote, the face played a role in determining the age. I find it hard to imagine a mature girl with a childlike face damn, Ment sent such a picture, okay, it was difficult for me until this moment, so it seems that you would have determined her age anyway.
And since you determined the age based on the face, it turns out that you approve of such costumes on 14-year-old girls.
More than small, but less than medium. So not quite.
So, if I had criticized your candidate on similar grounds, would you still understand me and not argue?
But as I said before, in your case, the rating could have been higher if there was a censored version.
I repeat once again - the numerical rating is a personal matter for everyone. But you expressed some very controversial thoughts about my picture, and I want you to fully answer for what you wrote.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
0
⚖️
0