Sacred Haven of Debauchery

How does determining age and evaluating a face relate to approving costumes, which are not taken into account when evaluating?

Well, that's a twist! Actually, you should be the one answering this question, because you said you lowered the rating specifically because of the costume, even though you initially claimed it was because of the underage appearance.

But since there's nudity here, and that's why I perceived the picture as just another joke, I lowered the score for those reasons.

Seriously?

I remembered how people used to make fun of Klov because of such pictures.
I remembered that Siv sent something similar to the photo contest last year. It's strange that it only occurred to him this year to post something like this.
I remembered the names of the contests.
So, it was a "cute kids" contest.

So, you're saying you wrote that as a joke? And don't babble about "it was after my post on the contest" – if it were a joke, you would have written, "Siver, you're overreacting, I was just kidding." But that didn't happen; instead, we see almost an open accusation of something that people in our country can be beaten, urinated on, imprisoned, castrated, or killed for.

Everyone has their own perception, concept of beauty, and evaluation of appearance; otherwise, we would have to argue with almost everyone.

There was nothing about evaluating appearance from the perspective of beauty in your post; it was solely accusations.

What specific thoughts do you consider subversive?

Have you already forgotten what we're talking about?