Posts from TOURNAMENT TROUBLES! Auto-translated

That's why the ban for VDV is formulated correctly, but yours isn't very good. Well, what can you do, the master is the master.

So, am I understanding correctly: I have every right to buy a hero who was fired today?

Then I'll ask another question right away. And what should I do with the killed ones, because I don't understand either of you or VDV. VDV has it written like this:

7. It is forbidden: to buy back your fired heroes on the same day (i.e., to use the "firing-buyback" trick);
it is also forbidden to buy heroes who died in battle (do not confuse with those who fled)!

Does he mean that the killed ones also cannot be bought back on THIS SAME turn, but can be bought back on the next one? How will it be in your rules?

Therefore:

1. Hiring a dismissed hero on the day of their dismissal is prohibited. On any other day, it is allowed.
2. Hiring a hero who has escaped (by paying a ransom) on the same day is allowed.
3. Hiring your own deceased hero again is prohibited.
4. Hiring a deceased enemy hero is allowed at any time.

I think that point 3 still lacks a couple of words - "Hiring your deceased hero on the day of his death is prohibited."

3. If your hero was defeated in a fair fight, he can no longer appear in the game. Lose – and you're out. No one forbade fleeing the battlefield or bribing your way out. But if the opponent has captured him (and what's the point of War Shackles in that case?), then that's it. Period. However, the opponent has every right to hire your hero. He has earned this right – he is the winner.

If you read this passage carefully, everything will fall into place.

Alright, rules are rules. Of course, one can argue, but it's not that important. So let's accept them as they are.

But still, here's an example:
Let's say there are several AI opponents on the map, and at one point, one AI kills another AI (a well-developed hero, who is very useful to you).
The rules don't prohibit buying the defeated AI heroes. But at the same time, you didn't contribute to his defeat...

Well, in my opinion, that's just luck... :D

Luck is luck, but the logic is a bit lost:D
And also, one of the game's tactics is lost - intentionally attacking with a strong hero against an opponent to weaken their troops, while incurring minimal losses (in the case when the opponent has War Chains equipped).

I disagree...
This tactic can be kept... but only if your hero manages to escape...
But if he's killed, then it's a failure...
Otherwise, the point of the "Chains of War" artifact is lost.
In my opinion, this is more logical! If you want to weaken the enemy with a strong hero, go ahead... but you need to escape in time... otherwise, you'll lose your hero forever.

IMHO

I did say that the opponent had War Shackles equipped...:confused:

Well, in my opinion, that's just bad luck... :smile34:

You probably meant the king... :D

Luck is luck, but some logic is lost:D
And one of the game's tactics is also lost – intentionally attacking with a strong hero to weaken the enemy's troops, while incurring minimal losses (in the case where the enemy has War Chains).