Auto-translated
Unfortunately, our resource hasn't tracked rankings since 2012.
There's a desire to rectify this, but there are different viewpoints (as usual).
One suggestion is to start calculating the ranking from scratch, based on the results of the first completed ranking Tournament (currently, 3 Tournaments are open).
The main arguments in favor of this option are that no one wants to calculate the ranking based on old Tournaments, and in the planned Tournaments, the ranking won't have much significance until the very end of the year. Therefore, there's time to compile a fairly objective ranking by the end of 2017 based on the Tournament results.
If anyone accomplishes the feat of calculating the previous Tournaments, that ranking can be used as a basis.
This is the first question for discussion.
The second question is the ranking calculation system.
Should all historical results be considered in the ranking, or only the last few Tournaments, with a gradually decreasing weight for each Tournament?
I'm not against a retrospective ranking, but I won't undertake to restore everything for past years.
It seems optimal to me to start a new ranking from 2017 based on Tournament results, while retaining all the points earned by the participants.
There's also a calculation system that seems very good to me: a player will receive points for a Tournament according to the following formula: O = W * 100 + D * 50 + B, where W is the number of wins, D is the number of draws, and B is a bonus based on the placement (B = number of participants / placement * 30).
For example, a Tournament with 15 participants, 1st place - 10 wins, 2nd place - 9 wins.
The winner will receive: 10 * 100 + 15 * 30 = 1450.
2nd place: 9 * 100 + 7.5 * 30 = 1125, and so on.
I suggest that all interested parties express their opinions on the topic and agree on one option.
In the future, it will be easy to keep track of the calculations
Будьте осторожны со своими желаниями. Иногда они исполняются.
