Player rating for online battles on full maps.

The problem isn't that.
It's that we should discuss it before writing to the Creator, at least about 2 problems:
- the retrospective nature of the current rating
- perhaps the formula itself needs to be revised.
Individually, I don't think anyone will allow a player with a certain rating to do whatever they think is right if they are given the right to maintain the official rating.

I fully support Vip's proposal in the rating thread.
1. I believe that the rating should either be calculated completely from scratch or based on the league system.
2. I am FOR Vip's formula:

a player will receive a number of points for a tournament according to the following scheme: O = W * 100 + D * 50 + B, where W is the number of wins, D is the number of draws, and B is a bonus based on the place taken (B = number of participants / place taken * 30)
For example, a tournament with 15 participants, 1st place - 10 wins, 2nd place - 9 wins
The winner will receive - 10 * 100 + 15 * 30 = 1450
2nd place - 9 * 100 + 7.5 * 30 = 1125, and so on

Honestly, I don't understand the basis for any objections at all. People have been playing for 4 years without a rating at all, and I don't think it's that important. And even if it is maintained, even unofficially, it's only a plus. That's one thing. Secondly, in 4 years, no one else has been brave enough to maintain a rating. But now someone has appeared, and they are being held back for some reason... I see that Vip is determined to work on the rating regardless of our discussions and the Creator's symbolic blessing, and I absolutely support him in this.
P.S. KillAndAction, do you mind if I move our discussion to the appropriate thread? Starting with your message from 24.11.2016 19:46 MSK