The issue isn't about objections or delays, but about logic. I believe it's unacceptable to make a decision about the rating unilaterally. There needs to be a community discussion.

I agree; here are the opinions of 5 people:
VIP and I share the same opinion – the rating should be calculated using a new formula, based on the League rating.
Then there's Stiletto's opinion. In general, it's similar, but he didn't comment on the formula:

We should take the entire historical rating without losing its relevance over time. All the information is on HeroLeague. Why without losing relevance? Because people have spent so much time playing, and then BAM! And everything is reset... It's a bit unpleasant.

You, KillAndAction, also didn't say anything against VIP's formula, but you didn't say anything in favor either. At the same time, you are the only one who believes it is necessary to calculate the rating for the last 4 years based specifically on tournaments on the Hive:

But we need to calculate the rating taking into account the tournaments that took place after the rating was no longer being updated...

And here's what I was talking about. The rating isn't that important to this person:

Personally, I don't care about the rating – whether it's zero, or from the portal (where I'm in the second hundred), or from the League (where I'm in the fiftieth). Numbers don't change the fact that, from some point on, the great players started to be a little wary of me. :smile17:

In conclusion, the overall opinion of those who have spoken is closer to:
1) Calculating the rating using VIP's new formula (2 in favor, 3 abstained)
2) Using the League rating as a basis (VIP also expressed this in the tournament thread) (3 in favor, 2 abstained, 1 against)
Maybe we should create a poll?