Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

Nothing frail

and could drink like a man.

Okay, I believe it.

It reminds me of that story about Arza and the bus driver.

Now we could reminisce about stories from ten years ago, get nostalgic about cartoons for preschoolers, and games from the last century, and then sigh that the Human Development Index has stalled at the level of the mid-2000s.

Okay, I believe you.

What's so bad about drinking a lot of beer at 16-18 years old?
It's not "bad," it's just not good!

What's so bad about drinking a lot of beer at 16-18 years old?
It's not bad. It's just not good!

I don't really care what people do at 16-18 years old.

But that's a valid concern. What if someone at that age is selling drugs?

It could even eat Russian-speaking babies.

The main thing is that they don't corrupt.

I'll save this for Ment, so we can reminisce together about the Russia we've lost.

It's sad, but... What are you talking about, Sive? Have we really lost such moments?

It's sad, but... What are you talking about, Sive? Have we lost those moments?

Well, at least most of the population is unlikely to end up in such a situation now.

Didn't most people have a good chance back then? ) Don't think I'm nitpicking, but there have always been plenty of libertines. Perhaps back then, noble status could be a reason, but now it's money.

Even formally, the law didn't really protect a peasant. Back then, someone could come to your home and say, "Give me your daughter," and your only option was to say "okay." And not just to you, but to your neighbor, and his neighbor, and everyone in your 100-apartment building, drawing an analogy to a village. It's hard to imagine such a situation now. Outrage against a specific person – yes, but something so widespread – unlikely.

- And on the third day, God created the "Remington" with a sliding bolt, so that man could shoot weasels

Without a detailed study of the laws, I can't say anything for sure. Except perhaps that if the law didn't "even formally" protect a peasant, it probably applied to anyone (except perhaps members of the imperial family), meaning that such a crime wasn't предусмотрено in the law. But again, I don't know. As far as I can quickly scan the documents, the laws in the Russian Empire were very complex and had a cumulative effect (or is this collection of laws structured this way?). In general, I won't be able to sort through tens of thousands of laws in chronological order. Although, on the other hand, there's always the issue of compliance with the laws.

so, in the first and second games, he created dinosaurs and homunculi?