Auto-translated
5 Dead.
Kash
Posts from What would you do?
Auto-translated
Open
How would you act?
15
voters
Single choice
Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
Kash
Wistrit
Auto-translated
Okay, I'll get right on that. I'll pour myself a cup of tea and start rescuing everyone. :)
P.S.
By the way, saving everyone isn't such a bad idea; you could sell them into slavery later. :smile49:
P.S.
By the way, saving everyone isn't such a bad idea; you could sell them into slavery later. :smile49:
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
Except the ones we've made
Arandor
Auto-translated
Why not try to save everyone? It's not a given that the attempt will fail and everyone will perish. Maybe we'll get lucky, or we'll come up with something and save ourselves (diplomacy, a super ambush, and my brilliant mind!) (this is about the village).
And if we take the island, maybe we'll find food and save everyone. But if not, and food is limited, what's the point of feeding only the strong if it's going to run out anyway and everyone will die? (Besides, people in their prime eat more than the elderly, children, etc.)... This is, of course, if we don't consider eating corpses, haha.
And the last option is generally for someone who's given up, because it will be difficult to survive alone (especially on an island).
In general, I would probably try (although I'm not sure). It's better than condemning people who believe in you to death. And there's a lot of responsibility, although it will be almost the same in the second case, but it will be a little different, because I would just be fulfilling my duty as a leader, and not acting on my personal impulses to save my own skin. And if you're not ready for that, then you're not a leader, and what the hell are you doing in that position? Haha.
That's how a true leader would act, in my opinion
And if we take the island, maybe we'll find food and save everyone. But if not, and food is limited, what's the point of feeding only the strong if it's going to run out anyway and everyone will die? (Besides, people in their prime eat more than the elderly, children, etc.)... This is, of course, if we don't consider eating corpses, haha.
And the last option is generally for someone who's given up, because it will be difficult to survive alone (especially on an island).
In general, I would probably try (although I'm not sure). It's better than condemning people who believe in you to death. And there's a lot of responsibility, although it will be almost the same in the second case, but it will be a little different, because I would just be fulfilling my duty as a leader, and not acting on my personal impulses to save my own skin. And if you're not ready for that, then you're not a leader, and what the hell are you doing in that position? Haha.
That's how a true leader would act, in my opinion
Be strong. Believe
kcfgogbfalgfl
Auto-translated
Why not try to save everyone? It's not a given that the attempt will fail and everyone will die. Maybe we'll get lucky or come up with something and save ourselves (diplomacy, a super ambush, and my brilliant mind!) (This is about the village).
This is about the village...
And if we take the island, maybe we'll find food and save everyone... But if not, and food is limited, what's the point of feeding only the strong if it's going to run out anyway and everyone will die? (Besides, people in their prime eat more than the elderly, children, etc.)... This is, of course, if we don't consider eating corpses.
And the last option is generally for a lone wolf, because it will be difficult to survive alone (especially on an island).
Arandor
Auto-translated
Ugu Ar, the "enemies" destroyed the village while trying to get the oil, and they won't be able to handle the deserters, especially since it's unlikely that everyone will have a weapon :)
well, anything can happen... it's still the same as staying in the village and trying to fight back (in case it works) or sending them into the forest, trying to escape (and suddenly you meet some help or find shelter)... in general, anything can happen =) and it's not a fact that by leaving the weak behind, you'll save the strong and save yourself)
if death awaits us, let it be a worthy one) it's better to die as a hero than to live as a slave! (or is that how it goes? X))
LET'S BE HEROES!)))
And if you hide everything and keep it for yourself, it will last for a very long time :)
for a very long time?).. wouldn't it be better to just kill yourself right away?))) and again, where is the certainty that the main cause of death will be hunger?.. maybe you'll go into the jungle and accidentally get killed there x)
Be strong. Believe
kcfgogbfalgfl
Auto-translated
well, anything can happen... it's like staying in the village and trying to defend it (maybe it will work) or sending them into the forest, trying to save them (and maybe they'll find some help or shelter)... in short, anything can happen =) and it's not a fact that by leaving the weak behind, you'll save the strong and save yourself
if death awaits us, let it be a glorious one! It's better to die as a hero than to live as a slave! (or something like that? :D)
LET'S BE HEROES!)))
SandroXXL
Auto-translated
This wasn't invented by Americans. It's an ancient Chinese stratagem... I think it's called that. There are 32 stratagems in total, and they were created in China 2000 years ago. And Chinese philosophers weren't stupid.
By the way, I didn't say that Americans invented it; I just saw it in a game and a movie.
Просто еще один
kcfgogbfalgfl
Auto-translated
Hmm, that’s something to think about.